Conductive Tube EMI Suppression in Power Tools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Power tools, particularly those with brushed motors, face challenges in effectively suppressing electromagnetic interference (EMI) while meeting regulatory standards in a cost and space-effective manner, as conventional EMI suppression components like capacitors are expensive, heavy, and inefficient.

Innovation Solution

A power tool design that incorporates a conductive tube electrically connected to a battery terminal via a resistor, acting as an electromagnetic shield to reduce EMI emissions, which is a lightweight, cost-effective, and space-saving solution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional EMI suppression components like capacitors are used, then EMI suppression effectiveness is improved, but weight and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI suppression effectivenessVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The conductive tube is electrically connected to the battery terminal, merging the structural tube with the EMI suppression function. This integration eliminates the need for separate EMI suppression components, achieving both structural support and EMI filtering in a single element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The conductive tube serves multiple functions: it provides structural support, acts as an EMI suppressor through its electrical connection to the battery terminal, and potentially serves as a heat dissipation path. This multi-functionality reduces overall system weight by eliminating dedicated EMI suppression components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional EMI suppression components like capacitors are used, then EMI suppression effectiveness is improved, but cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI suppression effectivenessVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The EMI suppression function is merged with the existing conductive tube structure, eliminating the need to purchase and install separate capacitor components. This reduces bill of materials cost and simplifies the manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The conductive tube with electrical connection to the battery terminal serves its own EMI suppression needs without requiring external active components. The tube's inherent conductivity combined with the electrical connection creates a passive EMI filtering effect that reduces component count and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional EMI suppression components are used, then EMI suppression effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEMI suppression effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The EMI suppression functionality is combined with the existing conductive tube and battery terminal connection, eliminating the need for additional components and wiring. This integration reduces device complexity while maintaining EMI suppression effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The electrical connection between the tube and the battery terminal effectively suppresses EMI emissions, meeting regulatory standards while minimizing weight and cost, as demonstrated by reducing EMI radiated by a pole sander from exceeding maximum allowed levels.

Implementation Method 1

A power tool design that incorporates a conductive tube electrically connected to a battery terminal via a resistor, acting as an electromagnetic shield to reduce EMI emissions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic shielding: Faraday Cage

Implementation Method 2

The EMI suppressor may comprise the resistor only and no other electrical component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11509198B2Electromagnetic interference suppression
Publication Date: 2022.11.22 BLACK & DECKER CORP
  • US11509198B2 patent drawing
  • US11509198B2 patent drawing
  • US11509198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power tool comprising: a conductive tube; a rear unit located at a rear end of the tube; a front unit located at a front end of the tube; a battery interface comprising a plurality of terminals, wherein the battery interface is located in the rear unit; a motor located in the front unit; at least one power line for supplying power from the rear unit to the front unit, wherein at least a portion of the power line is located within the tube; and an electromagnetic interference (EMI) suppressor for suppressing EMI from the at least one power line, the EMI suppressor comprising an electrical component electrically connecting the tube to a first terminal of the plurality of terminals.