Real-Time Conductivity Monitoring for Immunotherapy Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cancer treatments often fail to provide personalized and effective treatment outcomes, especially after metastasis, as they do not adequately account for individual patient responses and can suppress the immune system.

Innovation Solution

A medical diagnostic system that uses real-time measurement of bulk tissue conductivity during non-thermal ablation treatments, such as irreversible electroporation (IRE), to guide additional treatment decisions, allowing for customization based on individual patient responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional cancer treatments are applied, then tumor ablation is achieved, but immune system suppression occurs and treatment outcomes are not personalized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system measures bulk tissue conductivity in real-time during IRE treatment and uses this feedback to determine treatment completion and guide subsequent immunotherapy timing. This closed-loop control enables personalized treatment decisions based on actual tissue response rather than fixed protocols

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses bulk tissue conductivity as a key parameter to monitor treatment progress and determine when to administer additional treatments. By changing treatment timing and type based on conductivity measurements, the system achieves personalized treatment optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If additional treatments are administered immediately after ablation, then treatment intensity is maximized, but immune response enhancement is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment intensityVSAvoidimmune response
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines the optimal timing for subsequent treatments in advance by measuring bulk tissue conductivity during IRE. This allows planning of immunotherapy administration at the optimal time point (4-30 days post-ablation) to maximize immune response while maintaining treatment intensity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses periodic conductivity measurements during IRE treatment to monitor tissue changes over time. This periodic monitoring enables determination of the optimal interval before administering additional treatments, balancing treatment intensity with immune response enhancement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If real-time measurement of bulk tissue conductivity is implemented, then treatment customization is enabled, but measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment customizationVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the existing electrical pulses required for IRE treatment to simultaneously measure bulk tissue conductivity. The same electrodes and pulse generation hardware used for therapy also perform measurement, eliminating the need for separate complex measurement systems and enabling treatment customization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables tailored treatment plans that enhance the immune response, potentially leading to more effective tumor ablation and improved patient outcomes by optimizing the timing and type of subsequent treatments.

Implementation Method 1

the electrical pulses are configured to cause non-thermal irreversible electroporation of the tissue

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectIrreversible electroporation: Electrical Impedance Tomography

Implementation Method 2

measuring a current of the applied electrical pulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical conduction: Conduction (electrical)

Data Source

PatentEP3852868B1Treatment planning system for immunotherapy enhancement via non-thermal ablation
Publication Date: 2025.02.12 VIRGINIA TECH INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC
  • EP3852868B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3852868B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2D
  • EP3852868B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Described herein are methods and systems of treating a tissue in a patient using a non-thermal ablation technique; measuring a change in a treatment parameter in real-time during the step of ablating; and administering an additional treatment to the subject in response to the measured change. The step of administering the additional treatment can occur 4-30 days post ablating. The additional treatment can be selected from the group of: tissue resection, thermal ablation, non-thermal ablation, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy, biologic therapy, genetic therapy, and combinations thereof. The additional treatment can be measuring the amount of a pro-inflammatory immune molecule or cell, a suppressive immune molecule or cell, or both in a bodily fluid or a biopsied tissue of the patient. The non-thermal ablation technique can be irreversible electroporation. The non-thermal ablation technique, can be high-frequency irreversible electroporation. The treatment parameter can be bulk tissue conductivity.