Cone-Beam CT Intensity Correction for Circular-Scan Drop-Off

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cone-beam CT scanners using circular scanning configurations suffer from intensity drop-off artifacts due to insufficient raw data, leading to inaccurate image reconstruction.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the creation of a coefficient map for intensity compensation, which is inverted and applied voxel-wise to the reconstructed volume to correct for intensity drop-off, using forward projection and filtered back projection (FDK) algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a circular scanning configuration is used, then mechanical simplicity is improved, but image accuracy deteriorates due to intensity drop-off artifacts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning configuration complexityVSAvoidimage reconstruction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating correction factors using forward projection of a uniform object followed by reconstruction. These correction factors are computed before actual image reconstruction and stored for subsequent application, allowing the system to use simple circular scanning while achieving accurate results through pre-computed intensity compensation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the intensity parameter of the reconstructed image by applying correction factors derived from forward projection data. The correction factors modify the intensity distribution in the reconstructed volume, compensating for the intensity drop-off that occurs with circular scanning configurations and restoring uniform intensity across the field of view

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If a circular scanning configuration is used, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to insufficient raw data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning operation simplicityVSAvoidattenuation coefficient recovery accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary correction step between data acquisition and final reconstruction. Forward projection of a uniform object serves as an intermediary process that generates correction factors, which then mediate between the insufficient circular scanning data and the desired accurate attenuation coefficient recovery, enabling precise measurement while maintaining operational simplicity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If non-circular scanning geometries are used, then image accuracy is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage artifact reductionVSAvoidscanning geometry complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies inversion by reversing the traditional approach: instead of using complex non-circular scanning geometries to achieve uniform intensity, it uses simple circular scanning and inverts the problem by computing what the projection data should look like for a uniform object, then using this inverted knowledge to correct the actual reconstructions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method effectively reduces intensity drop-off artifacts, resulting in more accurate and artifact-free 3D image reconstruction.

Implementation Method 1

X-rays are directed to the sample, and are absorbed or scattered by the sample as the X-rays travel through the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray absorption: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

X-rays are directed to the sample, and are absorbed or scattered by the sample as the X-rays travel through the sample

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectX-ray scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 3

A detector system receives the transmitted X-rays, and creates an image representation, in pixels, of the received X-rays

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS20250259350A1Method and system for correcting cone beam scan CT for intensity drop-off
Publication Date: 2025.08.14 CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY INC
  • US20250259350A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259350A1 patent drawing
  • US20250259350A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for cone beam CT intensity correction such as for circular and other scanning geometries. The method comprises determining an intensity compensation for a selected scanning configuration and applying the intensity compensation to a reconstructed volume of interest to produce an intensity compensated volume, which is used to scale the volume of interest.