Conference System Access Right Management for Handwriting Overlap

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing conference supporting systems face issues with overlapping handwriting inputs on shared screens, leading to reduced readability and disrupted discussions, as users must constantly confirm the timing and area of other users' inputs to avoid simultaneous writing, which complicates smooth information exchange.

Innovation Solution

A conference supporting system where users or groups can acquire access rights to specific areas on the screen, allowing only authorized users to perform handwriting inputs, preventing overlaps and enabling efficient discussion and information exchange by allowing multiple users to write in the same area.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple users perform handwriting inputs simultaneously on the same area of the shared screen, then information exchange capability is improved, but readability deteriorates due to overlapping information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation exchange capabilityVSAvoidreadability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of overlapping handwriting inputs before they are fully displayed. The control apparatus detects potential overlaps in advance and preemptively manages the display, preventing the harmful effect of overlapping information while still allowing simultaneous input operations from multiple users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control apparatus acts as an intermediary between multiple input terminals and the display system. It receives handwriting inputs from multiple users, detects potential overlaps, and coordinates the display output to prevent overlapping information while maintaining simultaneous input capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If users must confirm the timing and area of other terminals' handwriting inputs to prevent simultaneous writing, then information overlap is prevented, but ease of operation deteriorates due to constant confirmation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation overlap preventionVSAvoidease of handwriting input
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides automatic detection and management of handwriting input overlaps without requiring user intervention. The control apparatus autonomously monitors inputs from multiple terminals, detects potential overlaps, and manages the display coordination, freeing users from the burden of constant confirmation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements automatic feedback mechanisms where the control apparatus continuously monitors handwriting inputs from multiple terminals and provides real-time coordination. This automated feedback loop prevents information overlap without requiring users to manually confirm timing and area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If exclusive control is implemented to prevent simultaneous handwriting inputs on the same area, then readability is maintained, but productivity deteriorates due to disrupted discussion flow

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereadabilityVSAvoiddiscussion efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of overlapping inputs and preemptively coordinates display management. This allows multiple users to maintain simultaneous input operations without actual overlapping information being displayed, preserving both readability and discussion flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically manages multiple handwriting inputs by detecting overlaps in real-time and coordinating display output adaptively. This dynamic approach allows flexible simultaneous input from multiple users while maintaining clear display readability, unlike static exclusive control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9106792B2Conference supporting system, control apparatus and input terminal
Publication Date: 2015.08.11 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US9106792B2 patent drawing
  • US9106792B2 patent drawing
  • US9106792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A conference supporting system includes plural input terminals and a control apparatus connected through a network. Each input terminal includes a processor and a display screen configured to allow a user to perform handwriting input thereon and to display the data. The processor of each input terminal is configured to perform making a user to choose who acquires an access right, making a request to acquire the access right to the control apparatus, and transmitting handwriting data to the control apparatus. The processor of the control apparatus is configured to perform granting an access right of a part or whole of the area determined by the user, giving one of the input terminals a notice about the granted access right, transmitting the handwriting data to other input terminals and operating the display screen of each of the other input terminals to display the handwriting data.