Conferencing Quality Indicator System for Mitigation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Video and audio quality in conferencing systems can be severely impacted by bandwidth constraints and various technical issues, leading to a poor user experience, especially in interactive or detail-dependent conferences, where quality feedback is often limited to individual users without informing others or triggering effective remedial actions.
Innovation Solution
A conferencing system that allows users to input quality issues, which are then communicated to other participants and the conference server, enabling automatic or human-confirmed actions such as recording, fault isolation, transcription, and rerouting to mitigate quality problems, thereby improving the overall conference experience.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of information
If quality feedback is provided only to individual users, then each user can be informed of their own quality issues, but other participants cannot understand the extent of quality problems for the conference as a whole
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines individual quality feedback into a centralized conference-wide quality indicator that is visible to all participants. The conference server aggregates quality metrics from multiple endpoints and presents a unified view of conference quality status, allowing all users to understand the overall quality situation rather than just their individual experience.
Solution Approach 2:
The conference server acts as an intermediary that collects quality feedback from individual endpoints, processes it centrally, and redistributes relevant information to all participants. This mediator approach enables individual users to report issues without directly communicating with others, while still providing conference-wide visibility into quality problems.
2Productivity
If automatic remedial measures are implemented, then quality issues can be addressed quickly without human intervention, but the system requires more complex automation capabilities
Solution Approach 1:
The system pre-configures remedial actions that are automatically triggered when quality thresholds are breached. Quality policies are established in advance that define specific actions to take when certain quality conditions occur, allowing the system to respond immediately without complex real-time decision-making logic.
Solution Approach 2:
The conference system automatically monitors its own quality metrics and initiates remedial actions without requiring external intervention. The system serves itself by detecting quality degradation and autonomously implementing corrective measures such as adjusting coding parameters or switching transmission paths.
3Reliability
If multiple quality management actions are implemented simultaneously, then comprehensive quality improvement can be achieved, but the system becomes more complex to manage
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies different quality management actions to different parts of the conference system based on local conditions. Rather than uniformly applying all possible remedial measures across the entire conference, the system selectively implements actions tailored to specific quality issues detected at particular endpoints or transmission paths.
Solution Approach 2:
The quality management system dynamically adjusts which remedial actions are implemented based on current conference conditions and the specific quality issues detected. The system can activate, deactivate, or modify quality management actions in real-time based on changing conference requirements and quality metrics.
Data Source
AI summary
Conferences are a popular way to hold meetings and presentations when the participants are not required to be physically together. However, the quality of a conference can vary based on a particular user's endpoint configuration, connection, network, conference content, and other factors. Providing a user with the ability to indicate a quality issue, as determined by the user, allows other users and systems to become aware that a user is experiencing quality issues and optionally take action to correct the issue.