Classification Model Training Using Confidence-Scored Auto-Labeling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Training machine-learning systems to detect and recognize images is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires large amounts of high-quality training data, which is often expensive to produce.

Innovation Solution

Utilizing a combination of multimodal large language models (LLMs) and domain-specific models to generate annotated training data with confidence scores, which are then used to train second machine-learned models by modifying their parameters based on these scores.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual annotation of training data is used, then data quality is high, but the process is labor-intensive and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata qualityVSAvoidlabeling speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses machine-learned models to automatically annotate training data without human intervention. The models generate labels and confidence scores autonomously, transforming the manual annotation process into an automated self-service system that maintains high data quality while dramatically increasing labeling speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates confidence scores from machine-learned models as feedback mechanisms. Samples with high confidence scores are used to train new models, while low confidence samples can be reviewed or used to refine existing models, creating a feedback loop that improves data quality and model performance iteratively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If large amounts of training data are collected, then model accuracy improves, but production cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary model training on a subset of data to create initial annotators. These preliminary models then rapidly annotate large portions of the training data, allowing the system to scale data collection without proportionally increasing training time for the main model

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates multiple machine-learned models that copy and replicate the annotation capabilities of highly accurate models. These copied models can independently generate training data at scale, effectively multiplying the productivity of the original model without requiring proportional increases in human annotation time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If existing machine-learned models are used for annotation, then labeling speed increases, but data quality may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelabeling speedVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of model confidence by using confidence scores to filter and select high-quality annotations. By adjusting the confidence threshold parameter, the system can control the balance between labeling speed and data quality, ensuring only high-confidence annotations are used for training

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses partial annotation by machine-learned models rather than requiring complete manual verification. By using models to annotate the majority of data with high confidence, and only reserving manual review for edge cases, the system achieves both high productivity and maintained data quality through selective application of human expertise

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20260023973A1Configuration and Training of Classification Models
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 GOOGLE LLC
  • US20260023973A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023973A1 patent drawing
  • US20260023973A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, devices, and non-transitory computer readable media for training machine-learning models are provided. The disclosed technology can include receiving input samples associated with classification concepts. Based on inputting the input samples into a first plurality of machine-learned models, classification outputs comprising labels and confidence scores can be generated. The first plurality of machine-learned models can comprise one or more multimodal large language models (LLMs) and one or more domain-specific models. Annotated input samples comprising the input samples, the classification outputs, and identifiers that identify each of the first plurality of machine-learned models that generated each of the classification outputs can be generated. Furthermore, based on the annotated input samples, one or more second machine-learned models can be trained. The training can comprise modifying parameters of the one or more second machine-learned models based on the confidence scores.