Confidential Computing Build Process with TEE Key Release Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Distributed software integration and build processes face challenges in protecting confidential intellectual property (IP) between mutually distrustful entities, such as OEMs and suppliers, due to potential security threats like unauthorized access, man-in-the-middle attacks, and exfiltration of secrets during build execution.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a trusted, distributed build process using confidential computing technologies, including hardware-based Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) and remote attestation to ensure that IP is protected during execution, integrity is maintained, and secrets are only released to trusted platforms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If distributed software integration is implemented between multiple entities, then collaboration and productivity are improved, but security risks and IP protection challenges worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware integration efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity threats to IP
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the build environment into isolated Trusted Execution Environments (TEEs) for each entity, allowing collaborative software integration while maintaining separate secure boundaries. Each entity's software modules are compiled and integrated within their own TEE, preventing unauthorized access to other entities' intellectual property while enabling efficient distributed collaboration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A key management server acts as an intermediary between entities, managing secret keys and controlling access to build environments. The server validates TEE measurements and selectively releases secret keys only to authorized, trusted environments, enabling secure collaboration without direct exposure of sensitive IP between competing entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If secret keys are stored securely for IP protection, then security is improved, but access control and key management complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIP protectionVSAvoidkey management system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The key management server automatically performs measurement validation and key release decisions based on pre-configured policies, eliminating manual intervention. The system self-regulates access by comparing TEE measurements against authorized configurations and automatically releasing or denying secret keys, reducing operational complexity while maintaining strong security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where TEE measurements are constantly validated against authorized configurations, and key release decisions are dynamically adjusted based on validation results. This automated feedback mechanism ensures IP protection while simplifying key management through policy-driven automatic decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If TEE measurements are validated for security, then trust and reliability are improved, but processing time and operational complexity worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplatform trustVSAvoidkey release validation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Authorized TEE measurements and configurations are pre-validated and stored in the key management server before actual build operations. When a TEE requests secret keys, the server compares measurements against pre-stored authorized values, significantly reducing validation time while maintaining strong security guarantees for platform trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12554619B2Systems and methods for implementing a trusted multiparty build process using confidential computing
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US12554619B2 patent drawing
  • US12554619B2 patent drawing
  • US12554619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for implementing a multi-party software build process using confidential computing includes encrypting, using one or more secret keys, a disk image of software configured to implement the software build process, storing the one or more secret keys and a key release policy that defines one or more conditions for releasing the one or more secret keys to entities associated with the software build process, and, using hardware configured to support operation of a trusted execution environment (TEE), launching a software environment within the TEE and performing a cryptographic measurement of the software environment, selectively providing the one or more secret keys based on validation of the cryptographic measurement of the software environment and the key release policy, and, using the one or more secret keys for decrypting the disk image, verifying integrity of the disk image, and launching the software build process.