Configurable Baseband Processing for Adaptive Multi-Band Transceivers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in adapting transmission and reception parameters to optimize communication across multiple networks and frequency bands, particularly in mobile devices where distance and environmental changes affect signal quality and interference.

Innovation Solution

A communication device with integrated RF transceivers and a configuration controller that adjusts RF transceiver and antenna parameters, along with a power management unit, to optimize channel conditions, reduce interference, and conserve power by selectively configuring transmitter and receiver stages and power supply signals based on real-time data and channel conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transmission power is increased to improve signal quality in mobile devices, then communication reliability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication reliabilityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic configuration of transmitter and receiver stages based on real-time channel conditions. The system adjusts which processing stages are active versus bypassed according to signal quality requirements, enabling adaptive power management that maintains communication reliability while minimizing power consumption when full processing is not needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selectively enabling or bypassing different transmitter and receiver processing stages. This allows the communication device to adjust its processing complexity and power consumption levels dynamically, matching the actual channel conditions rather than operating at fixed maximum power levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple transmitter and receiver stages are configured to support multiple networks and frequency bands, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-network compatibilityVSAvoidtransceiver complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal transceiver architecture where a single configurable transmitter and receiver can operate across multiple networks and frequency bands. By implementing selectable processing stages that can be dynamically configured, the system achieves multi-functionality without requiring separate dedicated hardware for each network standard, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The transceiver is divided into multiple independent processing stages that can be selectively enabled or bypassed. This segmentation allows the system to configure only the necessary stages for the current operating mode, reducing the effective complexity for each specific network while maintaining the capability to support multiple networks through selective activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If real-time channel monitoring and parameter adjustment are implemented, then communication efficiency is improved, but processing overhead increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication efficiencyVSAvoidprocessing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where channel conditions are monitored and used to dynamically configure transmitter and receiver stages. This feedback loop enables the transceiver to adapt its processing to actual channel quality, improving communication efficiency by avoiding unnecessary processing in good conditions while maintaining reliability in poor conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by selectively enabling only the necessary processing stages based on channel conditions. Instead of always performing full processing, the system uses just enough processing complexity to achieve the required communication quality, reducing overhead while maintaining efficiency when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20100136927A1Configurable baseband processing for receiver and transmitter and methods for use therewith
Publication Date: 2010.06.03 AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL SALES PTE LTD
  • US20100136927A1 patent drawing
  • US20100136927A1 patent drawing
  • US20100136927A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A configurable transceiver includes an RF receiver section that generates at least one downconverted signal from a received RF signal. A receiver processing module processes at least one downconverted signal in a plurality of receiver stages to produce a stream of inbound data, wherein the receiver processing module is configurable in response to a control signal to selectively bypass at least one of the plurality of receiver processing stages. A transmitter processing module processes outbound data in a plurality of transmitter stages to produce at least one baseband signal, wherein the receiver processing module is configurable in response to the control signal to selectively bypass at least one of the plurality of transmitter processing stages. An RF transmitter section generates at least one RF signal from the at least one baseband signal.