Configurable FEC Decoder for Low-Power Syndrome Computation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional forward error correction decoding systems are power hungry, slow, and inflexible, consuming excessive power even when channel conditions allow for lower computational demands.

Innovation Solution

A low-power block code forward error correction decoder that dynamically adjusts the number of compute units based on channel conditions, using a systolic array architecture with configurable syndrome computation, key-equation solver, and Chien search circuitry to minimize power consumption while maintaining decoding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If conventional forward error correction decoding systems are used, then decoding performance is maintained, but power consumption is excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoiddecoding performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder dynamically adjusts the number of active syndrome compute units and processing elements based on channel conditions. When channel conditions are good, fewer compute units are activated, reducing power consumption. When channel conditions deteriorate, more compute units are activated to maintain decoding performance. This dynamic reconfiguration resolves the contradiction between power consumption and decoding performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (number of active syndrome compute units, processing elements) based on channel quality metrics. By monitoring channel conditions and adjusting the activation threshold and number of active units, the system optimizes the balance between power consumption and decoding reliability for different operating scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If fixed computational resources are allocated, then hardware design is simplified, but the system is inflexible to varying channel conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to channel conditionsVSAvoidhardware configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder employs dynamic reconfiguration capabilities where the number of active syndrome compute units and processing elements can be adjusted based on channel conditions. This dynamic approach provides adaptability to varying channel conditions while using a modular architecture that manages hardware complexity through systematic organization of configurable resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The decoder is designed with universal compute units that can be dynamically configured to handle different decoding requirements. The same hardware resources (syndrome compute units, processing elements) serve multiple functions depending on channel conditions, providing versatility without requiring completely separate hardware for each operating mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If maximum computational resources are always active, then decoding speed is maintained, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecoding speedVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The decoder dynamically adjusts the number of active processing elements and syndrome compute units based on channel conditions and decoding requirements. When channel conditions are good and fewer corrections are needed, fewer processing elements are active, reducing power consumption while maintaining sufficient decoding speed. When errors increase, more processing elements are activated to maintain decoding throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system activates only the necessary number of compute units and processing elements required for the current channel conditions, rather than always running at maximum capacity. This partial action approach maintains adequate decoding speed for the actual workload while significantly reducing power consumption during favorable channel conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12537544B2Low-power block code forward error correction decoder
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 MAXLINEAR INC
  • US12537544B2 patent drawing
  • US12537544B2 patent drawing
  • US12537544B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system comprises a forward error correction decoder comprising syndrome computation circuitry, key-equation solver circuitry, and search and evaluator circuitry. The syndrome computation circuitry may comprise a plurality of syndrome compute units connected in parallel. The syndrome computation circuitry may be dynamically configurable to vary a quantity of the syndrome compute units used for processing of a codeword based on conditions of a channel over which the codeword was received. The syndrome computation circuitry may be operable to use a first quantity of the syndrome compute units for processing of a first codeword received over the channel when the channel is characterized by a first bit error rate and a second quantity of the syndrome compute units for processing of a second codeword received over the channel when the channel is characterized by a second bit error rate.