Configured Grant Resource Restriction for Uplink Collision Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems face inefficiencies in managing configured grant resources, leading to underutilization and resource wastage, particularly in 4G and 5G networks, which impact the overall capacity and performance of XR applications.

Innovation Solution

Implementing mechanisms to dynamically manage and optimize configured grant resources by selectively activating or deactivating them based on traffic conditions and device capabilities, ensuring efficient utilization and reducing resource wastage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If configured grant resources are provided for both enhanced Mobile Broadband (eMBB) and Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications (URLLC) services, then service coverage and accessibility are improved, but resource collision and interference increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice coverageVSAvoidresource collision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The configured grant resources are segmented into different types (Type 1 and Type 2) with distinct resource occasions and configurations. Type 1 resources are allocated for eMBB services while Type 2 resources are allocated for URLLC services, preventing resource collision between different service types while maintaining comprehensive service coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality characteristics are applied to different resource types: Type 1 resources are configured with parameters optimized for eMBB services (higher data rate, larger resource blocks), while Type 2 resources are configured with parameters optimized for URLLC services (lower latency, smaller resource blocks, higher reliability requirements). This local differentiation resolves the contradiction by allowing each service type to use resources with appropriate characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If Type 1 and Type 2 configured grant resources are configured with same or overlapping time-domain resources, then resource utilization efficiency is improved, but uplink orthogonality is compromised leading to interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource utilization efficiencyVSAvoidinterference
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The time-domain resource allocation is made dynamic through different periodicities and time offsets for Type 1 and Type 2 resources. Type 1 resources may use longer periodicity suitable for eMBB traffic patterns, while Type 2 resources use shorter periodicity for URLLC. The network can dynamically adjust these parameters based on service requirements, maintaining orthogonality when needed while allowing overlap when service conditions permit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

In addition to time-domain separation, the patent introduces frequency-domain differentiation through different physical resource blocks (PRBs) and resource allocation patterns for Type 1 and Type 2 resources. This multi-dimensional resource allocation (time + frequency) allows for both orthogonality and efficient utilization by separating resources in multiple dimensions simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If configured grant resources are frequently updated to adapt to varying service requirements, then service adaptability is improved, but system complexity and signaling overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Resources are pre-configured in two distinct types with predetermined parameters optimized for specific service categories. Type 1 resources are pre-configured for eMBB with appropriate bandwidth, modulation, and coding parameters, while Type 2 resources are pre-configured for URLLC with latency-optimized settings. This preliminary configuration reduces the need for frequent updates while maintaining service adaptability through selective resource type selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs periodic resource allocation with different periodicities for Type 1 and Type 2 resources, matching the traffic patterns of eMBB and URLLC services respectively. This periodic structure provides regular resource availability without requiring continuous reconfiguration, reducing signaling overhead while maintaining adaptability to periodic service demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP4578130B1Restriction of configured grant resource occasion
Publication Date: 2026.05.13 KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS NV
  • EP4578130B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP4578130B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4578130B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A wireless device delivers a first configured grant (CG), of a plurality of CGs, to a hybrid automatic repeat request (HARQ) entity of the wireless device in response to determining the first CG is to be used for a first physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission. The wireless device transmits, based on the HARQ entity and using the first CG, a transport block.