Configured Grant Transmission for Uplink Jitter Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Jitter in uplink data transmission by configured grant (CG) physical uplink shared channels (PUSCHs) introduces uncertainty in start time, leading to inefficient power consumption as network nodes blindly monitor each transmission occasion, including those without data, reducing the overall efficiency of data transmission.

Innovation Solution

Implementing multiple configured grant (CG) configurations with different transmission occasion densities, allowing the UE to transmit first PUSCH data in a sparse configuration and second PUSCH data in a denser configuration, enabling the network node to switch and reduce power consumption by monitoring fewer occasions initially.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the network node blindly monitors each PUSCH transmission occasion to ensure reliable data reception, then the reliability of data transmission is improved, but the power consumption increases due to monitoring occasions without data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission reliabilityVSAvoidnetwork node power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring process into two phases: initial sparse monitoring using first CG configurations and subsequent dense monitoring using second CG configurations. This segmentation allows the network node to reduce power consumption during the initial phase while maintaining reliability through the second phase, resolving the contradiction between reliability and power consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic switching between different CG configurations based on transmission conditions. The network node transitions from sparse to dense monitoring configurations dynamically, optimizing the balance between power consumption and reliability according to actual data transmission needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Use of energy by stationary object

If the network node uses sparse CG configurations with fewer transmission occasions, then the power consumption is reduced, but the data transmission speed decreases due to fewer monitoring occasions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork node power consumptionVSAvoiddata transmission speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by stationary objectVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic action by alternating between sparse and dense CG configurations in a structured sequence. The system uses periodic sparse monitoring initially, then transitions to periodic dense monitoring, achieving both power savings during sparse phases and high-speed transmission during dense phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by using sparse CG configurations in the initial transmission phase before switching to dense configurations. This preliminary sparse monitoring reduces immediate power consumption while the system prepares for subsequent high-speed dense transmission, optimizing the trade-off between power and speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Speed

If the network node switches to denser CG configurations after detecting data, then the data transmission speed is improved, but the complexity of managing multiple configurations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission speedVSAvoidCG configuration management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the network node monitors transmission conditions and uses this feedback to determine when to switch between CG configurations. This feedback-driven approach automates the configuration management process, reducing the operational complexity despite having multiple configurations available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent manages complexity by systematically changing key parameters of CG configurations (such as transmission occasion density) rather than managing all configuration details simultaneously. This parameter-focused approach simplifies the management process while enabling speed optimization through configuration switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240334429A1Transmission of packet via multiple configured grant configurations
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 QUALCOMM INC
  • US20240334429A1 patent drawing
  • US20240334429A1 patent drawing
  • US20240334429A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various aspects of the present disclosure generally relate to wireless communication. In some aspects, a user equipment (UE) may transmit, in a first physical uplink shared channel (PUSCH) transmission occasion of a first configured grant (CG) configuration, first PUSCH data of a packet. The UE may transmit, in a second PUSCH transmission occasion of a second CG configuration, second PUSCH data of the packet. Numerous other aspects are described.