Confined Explosion Damage Evaluation Platform

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for evaluating the damage effectiveness of warheads are inaccurate due to neglecting mass distribution and material performance of the case, and lack effective indexes for evaluating inhibition effectiveness, especially in varying atmospheres.

Innovation Solution

A device and method for evaluating confined explosion damage power, featuring a confined explosion case with atmosphere conversion guiding holes, explosion venting devices, and a concentration tester, which calibrates parameters using TNT bare charges to establish a δ-m relational map for quantitatively assessing equivalent bare charge and inhibition effects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods use charge mass ratio to case mass for conversion, then the calculation is simple, but the evaluation accuracy is low due to neglecting mass distribution and material performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidtest system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional mechanical calculation methods with an experimental test system that uses controlled explosions, pressure sensors, and data acquisition systems to directly measure and evaluate damage effectiveness, thereby achieving high accuracy without relying on simplified mass ratio calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a target plate as an intermediary element between the explosive charge and the case, which serves as a measurable indicator of damage effectiveness. The target plate's response provides objective data for evaluation, bridging the gap between complex internal explosion dynamics and quantifiable results

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If conventional methods evaluate damage with charge mass, then the evaluation is straightforward, but the result has large error because case absorbs energy during detonation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedamage evaluation accuracyVSAvoidenergy absorption measurement difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the energy absorption effect of the case from the overall system by using a standardized target plate that isolates and measures only the damage transmission through the case, allowing separate evaluation of case energy absorption and explosive damage effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where pressure sensors mounted on the case interior surface detect pressure changes during detonation, providing real-time data on energy absorption that feeds back into the evaluation system to correct and refine damage effectiveness calculations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If no specific indexes are used for inhibition effectiveness, then the evaluation system is simple, but the inhibition effectiveness of warhead cannot be evaluated effectively in varying atmospheres

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveatmosphere adaptabilityVSAvoidtest device complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs a universal test system with standardized components (pressure sensors, data acquisition systems, target plates) that can evaluate warhead performance across multiple atmosphere types (air, water mist, anoxic environments) using the same basic apparatus, thereby achieving high adaptability without proportionally increasing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent evaluates inhibition effectiveness by changing atmospheric parameters (oxygen concentration, humidity, pressure) and measuring their effect on detonation performance through standardized metrics, allowing systematic comparison of warhead behavior across different atmosphere conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a high-accuracy, universally applicable method for evaluating warhead damage effectiveness and inhibition effects in different atmospheres, enabling precise engineering applications and anti-explosion design.

Implementation Method 1

the pressure tank and the water pressure pump are configured to change a component composition in the confined explosion case

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

two side plates and a rear plate of the confined explosion case are provided with an explosion venting device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure release: Depressurisation

Implementation Method 3

the concentration tester is configured to obtain a component and a concentration in the confined explosion case

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas concentration detection:

Implementation Method 4

the cover plate is connected to a detonation control system through a lead

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDetonation: Detonation

Data Source

PatentUS11774224B1Device and method for evaluating damage power of internal explosion
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 WUHAN UNIV OF TECH
  • US11774224B1 patent drawing
  • US11774224B1 patent drawing
  • US11774224B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for evaluating a damage power of confined explosion, includes: determining a size of a confined case and a thickness of a target plate according to a requirement of evaluation on damage effectiveness of a warhead to establish an explosive damage effectiveness evaluation platform; calibrating parameters of the platform with a series of confined explosion tests of trinitrotoluene (TNT) bare charges in the case to form a relational map, in which a deflection of a mid-point of the target plate changes with a charge mass; obtaining a deflection of the mid-point of the target plate by detonating different warheads, forming different detonation atmosphere and forming different venting configuration in the case, and performing interpolation through the map to obtain an equivalent bare charge as an evaluation index. The method quantitatively evaluates the damage effectiveness of the warhead, and is not limited by the damage component.