Confocal Microscope Objective Lens Axial Chromatic Aberration Correction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional objectives for confocal microscopes fail to adequately correct axial chromatic aberrations, especially in short wavelength regions, which hinders high-resolution fluorescence observations and structure analysis of large samples.
Innovation Solution
The objective design includes a first lens group with a meniscus lens component and a second lens group, where the meniscus lens component has a convex surface facing the object, and the lens outer diameter is limited to ensure effective correction of axial chromatic aberrations across a wide wavelength range, satisfying specific conditional expressions to minimize RMS wavefront aberrations.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If a conventional objective is used to correct chromatic aberrations for a wide wavelength region, then chromatic aberration correction is improved, but axial chromatic aberration correction in short wavelength regions deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The objective lens is divided into multiple lens groups (first lens group G1, second lens group G2, third lens group G3) with distinct functions. The first lens group handles chromatic aberration correction for wide wavelength regions, while the second lens group specifically addresses axial chromatic aberration in short wavelength regions through its meniscus lens component with convex surface facing the object.
Solution Approach 2:
Different lens groups are designed with specific local optical properties. The meniscus lens component in the second lens group has a convex surface facing the object and satisfies specific conditional expressions (0≤|Δz1|/DOFe≤1.5 and 0≤|Δz2|/DOFe≤2) to provide localized correction for axial chromatic aberration in short wavelength regions, while other lens groups handle different wavelength ranges.
2Measurement precision
If the objective is designed for high resolution fluorescence observation, then measurement precision is improved, but the ability to analyze large samples in short time deteriorates
Solution Approach 1:
The objective maintains high numerical aperture (NA≥0.5) for high resolution while correcting aberrations across wide fields of view. The specific design parameters of the meniscus lens component and its positioning satisfy conditional expressions that enable simultaneous achievement of high resolution and wide field of view, allowing fast scanning of large samples without sacrificing image quality.
3Measurement precision
If the meniscus lens component is positioned closer to the image, then axial chromatic aberration correction is improved, but lens outer diameter increases
Solution Approach 1:
The meniscus lens component is positioned in the second lens group G2 which is closer to the image side, and its outer diameter is constrained by the conditional expression Φ1/DOFe≤4. This dimensional constraint enables effective axial chromatic aberration correction while preventing excessive increase in lens size, maintaining a compact objective design.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This design allows for improved axial chromatic aberration correction, enabling high-resolution fluorescence observations and structure analysis from short to long wavelengths, enhancing the capability to analyze large samples efficiently.
Implementation Method 1
a first lens group G1 including a meniscus lens component (L11) that is the closest to an image among lens components of the first lens group G1, the meniscus lens component L11 having a convex surface facing an object
Data Source
AI summary
An objective includes: a first lens group that includes a meniscus lens component that is the closest to an image among lens components of the first lens group, the meniscus lens component having a convex surface facing an object; and a second lens group that is closer to the image than the first lens group is, and the objective satisfies the following conditional expressions:0≤|Δz1|/DOFe≤1.5 (1)0≤|Δz2|/DOFe≤2 (2)where Δz1 indicates a difference between a h-line minimization position and an e-line minimization position; Δz2, a difference between a position on then optical axis at which an RMS wavefront aberration in light having a wavelength of 800 nm is minimized and the e-line minimization position; DOFe, a depth of focus for the e line.


