Conformal Inference Optimization for Biopolymer Sequences

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning methods for Bayesian optimization are poorly suited for discrete, high-dimensional spaces like biopolymer sequences, as they rely on Gaussian process priors that fail to provide accurate function estimates and calibrated uncertainties, especially in low-data regimes, and approximate inference methods often result in poorly reflective posterior estimates.

Innovation Solution

The use of a neural network as a surrogate function, combined with conformal inference optimization, which calculates confidence intervals based on nearest neighbors to provide a more accurate and calibrated uncertainty estimation, allowing for optimized biopolymer sequence design by selecting candidate sequences with an optimized linear combination of conformal inference intervals and predicted values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If Gaussian process priors are used to model the objective function in Bayesian optimization, then theoretical guarantees are established, but the method is poorly-suited for discrete, high-dimensional, combinatorial spaces and provides poor function estimates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetheoretical guaranteesVSAvoidfunction estimate accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of the optimization approach by replacing Gaussian process priors with conformal inference based on nearest-neighbor search. This allows the method to work in discrete, high-dimensional combinatorial spaces while maintaining validity guarantees through the conformal prediction framework, thus resolving the contradiction between theoretical guarantees and suitability for discrete spaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the Gaussian process mechanical system with a conformal inference system based on distance metrics and nearest-neighbor search. This replacement maintains the Bayesian optimization framework while using fundamentally different mathematical mechanisms that are appropriate for discrete, high-dimensional spaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If neural networks are used as surrogate functions, then more accurate function estimates and arbitrary model complexity are achieved, but fully-Bayesian treatment of uncertainty becomes intractable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunction estimate accuracyVSAvoidinference complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the uncertainty quantification component from the neural network and handles it separately through conformal inference. The neural network provides accurate function estimates while the conformal prediction framework independently provides validity guarantees, avoiding the need for intractable fully-Bayesian treatment of neural network uncertainty

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the uncertainty estimation problem into two parts: the neural network handles function estimation while conformal inference handles uncertainty calibration. This segmentation allows each component to operate in its optimal regime without the computational burden of joint Bayesian treatment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If approximate inference methods are used for neural networks, then computational tractability is achieved, but the posterior estimates poorly reflect the true posterior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidposterior calibration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces conformal inference as an intermediary layer between the neural network predictions and the final uncertainty estimates. This intermediary recalibrates the neural network outputs to provide valid posterior estimates that both reflect computational efficiency and maintain statistical reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230122168A1Conformal Inference for Optimization
Publication Date: 2023.04.20 FLAGSHIP PIONEERING INNOVATIONS VI LLC
  • US20230122168A1 patent drawing
  • US20230122168A1 patent drawing
  • US20230122168A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Accurate function estimations and well-calibrated uncertainties are important for Bayesian optimization (BO). Most theoretical guarantees for BO are established for methods that model the objective function with a surrogate drawn from a Gaussian process (GP) prior. GP priors are poorly-suited for discrete, high-dimensional, combinatorial spaces, such as biopolymer sequences. Using a neural network (NN) as the surrogate function can obtain more accurate function estimates. Using a NN can allow arbitrarily complex models, removing the GP prior assumption, and enable easy pretraining, which is beneficial in the low-data BO regime. However, a fully-Bayesian treatment of uncertainty in NNs remains intractable, and existing approximate methods, like Monte Carlo dropout and variational inference, can highly miscalibrate uncertainty estimates. Conformal Inference Optimization (CI-OPT) uses confidence intervals calculated using conformal inference as a replacement for posterior uncertainties in certain BO acquisition functions. A conformal scoring function with properties amenable for optimization is effective on standard BO datasets and real-world protein datasets.