Conformal Training for Machine Learning Confidence Sets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machine-learning classification models lack reliable uncertainty estimates and formal guarantees, particularly in high-stake applications like medical diagnosis and autonomous driving, as they do not provide confidence sets with user-specified probabilities, leading to inefficiencies in decision-making.

Innovation Solution

The method involves training a classification machine-learning model end-to-end with a conformal predictor to optimize confidence sets, using differentiable smooth calibration and prediction functions to determine threshold values and update model parameters, thereby reducing the size and improving the composition of predicted confidence sets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional machine-learning classification models are used, then the model can generate predictions, but the model lacks reliable uncertainty estimates and formal guarantees

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuncertainty estimateVSAvoidmodel structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the classification model and conformal predictor into a single integrated system. The conformal predictor is trained end-to-end with the classification model, allowing the model to learn both classification and uncertainty estimation simultaneously. This merging resolves the contradiction by achieving reliable uncertainty estimates without requiring separate complex modules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The classification model is designed to perform multiple functions: generating predictions and providing uncertainty estimates through the conformal predictor. By making the model universal, it eliminates the need for separate uncertainty estimation modules, thus improving reliability without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the confidence set size is increased to improve coverage, then the confidence level guarantee is maintained, but the predictive efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence level guaranteeVSAvoidpredictive efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic thresholding where the confidence set threshold is adjusted based on the desired confidence level and empirical calibration data. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain the required confidence level guarantee while minimizing the confidence set size, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and predictive efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The conformal predictor uses parameter optimization to adjust the confidence threshold and set composition. By changing the threshold parameter based on calibration data and confidence level requirements, the system achieves the optimal balance between maintaining confidence guarantees and minimizing set size for maximum predictive efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If end-to-end training with conformal predictor is implemented, then the confidence sets are optimized, but the training complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfidence set optimizationVSAvoidtraining process
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional two-stage training (separate classification training followed by conformal calibration) with end-to-end gradient-based optimization. This substitution allows simultaneous optimization of both classification performance and confidence set quality through unified loss functions, achieving better confidence set optimization without proportionally increasing training complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The end-to-end training implementation incorporates feedback loops where the conformal predictor's performance on validation data feeds back into adjusting the classification model parameters. This feedback mechanism enables iterative optimization of confidence sets while maintaining manageable training complexity through automated hyperparameter tuning and calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240394541A1Conformal training of machine- learning models
Publication Date: 2024.11.28 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US20240394541A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394541A1 patent drawing
  • US20240394541A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, computer systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for training a classification machine-learning model. The system obtains calibration training examples and prediction training examples, determines a threshold value based on the calibration training examples, generates data characterizing predicted confidence sets based on the threshold value and the prediction training examples, and update model parameters based at least on the predicted confidence sets.