Congestion-Friendly Adaptive Cruise Control via Mid-Point Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle technologies, including adaptive cruise control (ACC), are ineffective in managing congestive driving conditions, leading to traffic 'shockwaves' and congestion due to poor driver reaction times and inadequate optimization of vehicle distances.

Innovation Solution

A congestion-based adaptive cruise control system that uses a processor and radar sensor arrangement to determine distance values for front and rear vehicles, processing this data to generate control signals for acceleration, deceleration, and braking, positioning the vehicle optimally between the two to mitigate congestion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional adaptive cruise control is used to maintain safe distance from front vehicle, then individual vehicle safety is improved, but traffic congestion and shockwaves worsen due to poor driver reaction time and inadequate distance optimization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual vehicle safetyVSAvoidtraffic flow efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines front vehicle detection and rear vehicle detection into a single integrated congestion-based ACC system. The radar sensor arrangement simultaneously measures distances to both front and rear vehicles, and the processor integrates this data to calculate optimal velocity that maintains safe distances from both directions, resolving the contradiction by merging individual safety functions into a collective traffic flow optimization system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by constantly monitoring distances to front and rear vehicles via radar sensors, processing this data to determine optimal velocity, and adjusting vehicle velocity through acceleration or braking control. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables dynamic distance optimization that prevents congestion while maintaining safety, addressing both individual vehicle reliability and overall traffic productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If sudden braking is applied by front vehicle, then immediate safety response is improved, but cascading braking effect worsens congestion through amplifying shockwaves rearwards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimmediate safety responseVSAvoidcascading braking shockwaves
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by having the rear vehicle proactively reduce velocity before the front vehicle brakes. When the processor detects that the front vehicle distance is decreasing or the front vehicle is braking, it commands the rear vehicle to decelerate in advance, preventing the cascading braking effect that creates shockwaves. This anticipatory action maintains safety while eliminating the harmful amplifying effect

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The congestion-based ACC system performs preliminary action by continuously calculating optimal velocity based on real-time radar data from both front and rear vehicles. Before any emergency braking situation occurs, the system has already positioned the vehicle at the optimal distance and velocity, preventing the need for sudden reactive braking that generates shockwaves

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If vehicle distance to front vehicle is reduced to improve traffic density, then road capacity is improved, but collision risk worsens due to insufficient reaction time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroad capacityVSAvoidcollision avoidance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by continuously adjusting the vehicle velocity based on real-time radar measurements of front and rear vehicle distances. Rather than maintaining a fixed distance, the processor dynamically calculates optimal velocity that adapts to changing traffic conditions, allowing the vehicle to safely operate at reduced distances when appropriate while maintaining collision avoidance through active velocity control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The radar sensor arrangement provides continuous feedback on distances to front and rear vehicles, enabling the processor to dynamically adjust velocity commands. This feedback mechanism ensures that even when vehicles are positioned closer together to improve road capacity, the system maintains safe operating distances through active control, preventing collisions while maximizing traffic density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively optimizes vehicle positioning to reduce congestion by dynamically adjusting speed to maintain a stable distance, thereby improving traffic flow and safety in congested conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a radar sensor arrangement, operatively coupled to the processor, the sensor arrangement being configured to determine (i) a distance value for a front vehicle based on a front vehicle velocity, and (ii) a distance value for a rear vehicle based on a rear vehicle velocity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS9272711B1Congestion-friendly adaptive cruise control
Publication Date: 2016.03.01 VOLKSWAGEN AG
  • US9272711B1 patent drawing
  • US9272711B1 patent drawing
  • US9272711B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A congestion-based adaptive cruise control (ACC) system for a vehicle. A processor may provide control signals for the vehicle to modify at least one of acceleration, deceleration and braking in the vehicle. A radar sensor arrangement, operatively coupled to the processor, is configured to determine (i) a distance value for a front vehicle based on a front vehicle velocity, and (ii) a distance value for a rear vehicle based on a rear vehicle velocity. The processor may be configured to process (i) and (ii) from the radar sensor arrangement to determine a velocity value for the vehicle, and generate at least one control signal based on the velocity value to alter the velocity of the vehicle using at least one of acceleration, deceleration and braking to position the vehicle substantially at a mid-point between the front vehicle and rear vehicle.