Conical Active Antenna Layout for Wide-Angle Beam Scanning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing active antennas for fighter jets are limited by their planar configuration, which restricts the utilization of the internal volume of the conical radome, thereby reducing the angular scanning range and capabilities in radar detection, electronic warfare, and telecommunications.

Innovation Solution

The arrangement of radiating elements on a non-planar, preferably conical support surface within the radome, utilizing phase compensation to optimize the internal volume and enhance the number and angular coverage of the antenna, with embodiments featuring concentric circular or polygonal rings and inclined elements to compensate for geometric and electronic phase shifts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If radiating elements are arranged on a planar platform, then the antenna structure is simple and easy to manufacture, but the internal volume of the conical radome is not fully utilized and the angular scanning range is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinternal volume utilization of radomeVSAvoidantenna structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies curvature by transitioning from a planar platform to a conical support surface for mounting radiating elements. This curved surface configuration enables the antenna to conform to the conical radome geometry, maximizing internal volume utilization while maintaining a systematic arrangement of elements through concentric rings and spiral patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent moves from a two-dimensional planar arrangement to a three-dimensional conical surface arrangement. By distributing radiating elements along the conical surface with varying radial distances and angular positions, the design exploits the third dimension to increase the effective aperture and angular coverage without proportionally increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If radiating elements are arranged on a conical support surface, then the angular scanning range and radar detection capabilities are increased, but phase compensation is required to maintain radiation pattern quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangular scanning rangeVSAvoidphase compensation requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by implementing position-dependent phase compensation. Each radiating element's phase is adjusted according to its specific location on the conical surface, with phase shifts calculated based on radial distance from the vertex and angular position. This localized phase control maintains coherent radiation patterns across the extended angular scanning range.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying the phase of each radiating element based on its spatial coordinates on the conical surface. The phase parameter is modified as a function of radial distance and angular position, enabling the array to maintain consistent radiation characteristics while scanning across different angles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If additional radiating elements are added to increase EIRP and antenna gain, then the radiation power and detection capability are enhanced, but the device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveElectronic Isotropically Radiated Power (EIRP)VSAvoidmanufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by organizing radiating elements into discrete concentric rings with specific numbers of elements per ring. This segmented approach allows systematic placement of elements (e.g., 6 elements in first ring, 12 in second ring) while maintaining manufacturing feasibility through modular assembly and standardized element configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nesting by arranging radiating elements in concentric rings that are nested within the conical radome structure. Each ring is positioned at a specific radial distance from the vertex, creating a nested configuration that efficiently packs multiple elements within the available volume while maintaining access for manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentEP4293823B1Active antenna with radiating elements mounted on a conical surface
Publication Date: 2025.12.03 THALES SA
  • EP4293823B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4293823B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4293823B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Active antenna (300) comprising a plurality of radiating elements (ERij), characterized in that the radiating elements (ERij) are arranged on a non-planar support surface (S') which is inscribed inside a cone (S), a radiating element being positioned at a point (CRij) of the support surface (S') such that a normal direction (Vij) to said radiating element (ERij) forms an angle of inclination with respect to an axis (A) of the cone.