Conical Friction Damper With Self-Centering Seismic Energy Dissipation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing mechanical dampers are inadequate in effectively dissipating mechanical forces applied to structures during seismic events, leading to potential structural damage and instability.

Innovation Solution

A self-centering conical friction damper is developed, comprising clamping plates, a shear plate, and a conical wedge with a bias mechanism, which utilizes frictional engagement between conical elements to dissipate energy and return to a neutral state, allowing for efficient energy absorption and structural support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional mechanical dampers are used to dissipate seismic forces, then some energy dissipation is achieved, but the dissipation effectiveness is inadequate and structural damage still occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy dissipation effectivenessVSAvoidstructural safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs conical surfaces instead of traditional planar friction surfaces. The conical wedge elements with curved surfaces provide larger contact areas and more uniform stress distribution, significantly enhancing friction-based energy dissipation effectiveness while maintaining structural reliability during seismic events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The damper design nests multiple friction interfaces within a compact assembly. The conical wedge elements are positioned between clamping plates, creating nested friction interfaces that multiply energy dissipation mechanisms within a confined space, thereby improving both energy dissipation and structural protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Loss of energy

If friction-based dampers are used, then energy dissipation is achieved, but the dampers cannot return to their neutral state after deformation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy dissipationVSAvoidself-centering capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The conical wedge elements function as mechanical counterweights that generate restoring forces. When deformed, the geometry of the conical surfaces creates asymmetric friction forces that push the damper components back toward their neutral position, enabling self-centering capability while maintaining effective energy dissipation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The conical geometry introduces asymmetry in the friction interface. The angled surfaces create different friction characteristics during compression and rebound, generating a net restoring force that returns the damper to its neutral state after seismic deformation, thus achieving both energy dissipation and self-centering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Loss of energy

If multiple friction interfaces are created to improve energy dissipation, then energy absorption increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy absorption capacityVSAvoidstructural complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The conical wedge elements serve multiple functions simultaneously: they provide friction-based energy dissipation, generate self-centering restoring forces, and maintain compact geometry. This multi-functionality achieves high energy absorption capacity without proportionally increasing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The damper effectively dissipates mechanical energy from various directions, reduces structural damage, and self-centers after the energy dissipation, ensuring the structure's stability and safety during seismic events.

Implementation Method 1

An active surface portion of the male element is in frictional contact with an active surface portion of the female element with a coefficient of friction μ′

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

A bias mechanism is operative to compress the shear plate and wedge between the clamping plates

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS11993950B2Self-centering conical friction damper
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 THE UNIV OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
  • US11993950B2 patent drawing
  • US11993950B2 patent drawing
  • US11993950B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments provide mechanical dampers. The mechanical dampers may be applied to dissipate energy in a structure that arises for example from a dynamic load such as seismic activity, vehicle impact, vibration of the structure, wind forces, an explosion, etc. The damper comprises a pair of clamping plates. A shear plate is held between the clamping plates. The shear plate is movable in transverse directions relative to the clamping plates. The damper also comprises a conical wedge coupled between one of the clamping plates and the shear plate. The conical wedge comprises a female conical element and a male conical element that projects into a conical indentation of the female conical element.