Conical Air-Gap Solenoid Drive for Fast Textile Yarn Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cutting devices for textile machines face challenges in efficiently severing a wide range of yarn diameters and materials with high speed and precision, while maintaining low energy consumption and reducing production, operating costs, and installation space.

Innovation Solution

An electromagnetic drive with a solenoid and piston system, featuring conical end faces and a core tube, optimized material selection, and a progressive spring return mechanism, to enhance magnetic flux and minimize losses, allowing for efficient and rapid thread severing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Force

If conventional electromagnetic drives are used with high power consumption, then cutting force is sufficient, but energy consumption is excessive (over 400-500 W)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting forceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the geometric parameters of the air gap by implementing conical end faces instead of parallel faces. This parameter change allows the air gap cross-sectional area to increase during piston movement, improving magnetic flux distribution and reducing energy consumption while maintaining cutting force requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies curvature by using conical surfaces for the end faces of the piston and counter-face. This curved geometry replaces the conventional parallel flat surfaces, creating a varying air gap that optimizes magnetic field distribution and reduces energy losses

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Force

If the air gap between piston and counter face is small, then magnetic field strength is high, but the range of yarn diameters that can be cut is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemagnetic field strengthVSAvoidrange of yarn diameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic air gap configuration where the cross-sectional area varies during piston movement. The conical geometry creates a progressive change in air gap size, allowing the system to adapt to different cutting requirements and yarn diameters while maintaining effective magnetic field strength

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the air gap geometry from a fixed parallel configuration to a variable conical configuration. This parameter change allows the air gap to be optimized for different operating conditions, enabling the cutting device to handle a broader range of yarn diameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If conventional parallel air gap design is used, then结构简单 (structure is simple), but magnetic flux losses are high and cutting performance is moderate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidmagnetic flux losses
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple parallel flat surfaces with conical curved surfaces. This geometric transformation reduces magnetic flux losses by creating a more efficient flux distribution pattern, improving cutting performance while adding only moderate structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces asymmetry in the air gap geometry through the conical configuration, where the gap width varies along the axial direction. This asymmetric design optimizes magnetic flux distribution and reduces losses compared to the symmetric parallel configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved cutting performance across various yarn diameters and materials, reduces energy consumption, lowers production and maintenance costs, and minimizes installation space, while ensuring quick and precise thread severing.

Implementation Method 1

The solenoid also comprises a coil for producing a magnetic field which drives the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

Between an end face of the piston and a counter face of a component of the solenoid, said component being stationary relative to the piston, there is an axial air gap which is varied in accordance with the movement of the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS12466099B2Electromagnetic drive for a cutting device of a textile machine, cutting device and yarn clearer
Publication Date: 2025.11.11 SAURER INTELLIGENT TECH AG
  • US12466099B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromagnetic drive for a cutting device of a textile machine for severing a thread, a cutting device having an electromagnetic drive, and a yarn clearer having a cutting device are provided. The electromagnetic drive may comprise a solenoid and a piston configured to drive a cutting blade carrier. The piston may be guided for linear movement within the solenoid and may be configured to be linearly moved between a rest position and a working position. The electromagnetic drive may comprise an axial air gap between an end face of the piston and a counter face of a component of the solenoid. The component may be stationary relative to the piston and the axial air gap may be varier based on movement of the piston.