Conical Compressible Springs for Athletic Helmet Impact Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional helmets in contact sports fail to adequately absorb and distribute impact forces, leading to a higher risk of concussions and long-term brain damage from chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

Innovation Solution

A safety helmet design featuring conical compressible springs positioned between an outer shell and an inner rigid liner to absorb and distribute impact forces, allowing for uniform deacceleration and dissipation of forces, with a low coefficient of friction tab member to enhance force distribution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If conventional padding absorption is used in football helmets, then the helmet structure is simple, but the impact forces are not absorbed and distributed efficiently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimpact force absorptionVSAvoidhelmet structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the energy absorption system by using conical compressible springs with specific geometric parameters (cone angle, wire diameter, coil spacing) that can be optimized to absorb and distribute impact forces more effectively than conventional padding, while maintaining a relatively simple overall helmet structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a composite structure combining the outer shell, inner rigid liner, and conical compressible springs as a multi-component energy absorption system, where each component serves a specific function in distributing and absorbing impact forces, thereby improving energy loss characteristics without excessive structural complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional padding is used, then the helmet is lightweight, but the force distribution is insufficient to minimize concussion risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcussion riskVSAvoidhelmet weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The conical shape of the springs with optimized geometric parameters provides superior force distribution characteristics compared to conventional padding, reducing concussion risk without requiring excessive material or weight, as the geometric configuration itself provides the mechanical advantage for force distribution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If conventional padding absorption is used, then manufacturing is simple, but impact forces are not uniformly distributed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce distribution uniformityVSAvoidhelmet manufacturing
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By changing from isotropic padding to anisotropic conical spring elements with specific geometric parameters, the system achieves uniform force distribution in multiple directions, and the modular spring design allows for standardized manufacturing processes that can be scaled production

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The helmet effectively reduces the severity of head injuries by absorbing and redistributing impact forces, minimizing the risk of concussions and long-term brain damage from blunt force impacts.

Implementation Method 1

the coil springs can compress into a fully flattened position thereby absorbing the force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

conical compressible springs positioned between an outer shell and an inner rigid liner to absorb and distribute the force of impact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 3

a top portion of the smaller diameter tip of each conical spring defining a low coefficient of friction tab member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS11259588B2Athletic helmet
Publication Date: 2022.03.01 YOUNG WILLIAM O
  • US11259588B2 patent drawing
  • US11259588B2 patent drawing
  • US11259588B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Compressible conical springs with unsecured tabs are positioned between an outer helmet and an inner rigid liner to absorb and distribute impact forces to minimize concussion risks and other head injuries.