Conjugated Polymer Sensors Analyte Discrimination via Inner Filter Effect

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current π-conjugated polymer-based sensors face challenges in differentiating similar analytes due to nonspecific interactions and the lack of specific recognition elements, limiting their ability to profile analytes in complex mixtures effectively.

Innovation Solution

The use of π-conjugated polymers with controlled optical properties and the inner filter effect (IFE) in conjunction with multivariate pattern recognition techniques, such as Linear Discriminant Analysis and Principal Component Analysis, allows for the detection and discrimination of analytes without the need for traditional receptor chemistries or spatially distinct sensor elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional receptor chemistries are used in π-conjugated polymer sensors, then specific recognition of analytes is achieved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalyte recognition specificityVSAvoidsensor structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the traditional receptor chemistry component from the sensor system. Instead of incorporating specific binding receptors into the polymer structure, the invention uses the inner filter effect where the polymer's optical properties directly interact with analytes through spectral overlap, eliminating the need for complex receptor-analyte binding mechanisms while maintaining detection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by using a single π-conjugated polymer material that can detect multiple different analytes through the inner filter effect. The polymer serves multiple detection functions simultaneously without requiring different receptor chemistries for different analytes, achieving multi-analyte detection with one sensor material

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If spatially distinct sensor elements are used to detect different analytes, then analyte discrimination is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanalyte discrimination capabilityVSAvoidsensor array complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the detection of multiple analytes into a single sensor element rather than using separate spatially distinct sensors. By using one π-conjugated polymer that can interact with multiple analytes through the inner filter effect, the invention combines multiple detection functions in one material, eliminating the need for complex sensor arrays while maintaining the ability to discriminate between different analytes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter changes in the optical properties of the polymer-analyte interaction to enable discrimination. Instead of relying on spatial separation, the invention varies detection parameters such as fluorescence intensity, emission spectrum, and absorption characteristics to distinguish between different analytes, allowing multiple analytes to be detected and discriminated using a single sensor element

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If nonspecific interactions are used in π-conjugated polymer sensors, then ease of manufacture is improved, but measurement precision and analyte differentiation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesensor fabrication simplicityVSAvoidanalyte differentiation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent exploits color changes and optical property variations in the polymer-analyte interaction to maintain measurement precision. The inner filter effect causes changes in fluorescence emission spectra and absorption characteristics when analytes bind to the polymer, providing distinct optical signatures that enable accurate analyte differentiation while maintaining the simplicity of the polymer-based sensor system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables sensitive and selective detection of analytes across a wide concentration range, from femtomolar to molar levels, and allows for the discrimination of structurally similar analytes, enhancing the scope of sensing technologies for applications like food and water quality monitoring, medical analysis, and environmental monitoring.

Implementation Method 1

The inner filter effect (IFE) results from the absorption of light by a chromophore in solution, preventing photons from reaching a fluorophore, creating an observed decrease in fluorescence emission.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInner filter effect: Absorption (EM radiation)

Implementation Method 2

CP-based sensors have been recently reported utilizing the IFE for the detection of contaminants

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluorescence: Fluorescence

Data Source

PatentUS11781986B2Methods for detecting analytes using conjugated polymers and the inner filter effect
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI
  • US11781986B2 patent drawing
  • US11781986B2 patent drawing
  • US11781986B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The methods disclosed utilize π-conjugated polymers (CPs) as sensors for various analytes through the inner filter effect (IFE). Further, the methods utilize CPs with controlled optical properties for targeting sensing applications and operates through a novel IFE-based method, providing sensitive and selective sensors that operate in complex environments. The methods further provide calibration standards for the identification of similar and structurally distinct target analytes, where the analyte is a small molecule, macromolecule, and/or biological organism of interest.