Connected Car Analysis System for Driver Behavior Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Telematics systems for vehicle monitoring are limited in their ability to analyze driving events as they lack contextual information, failing to account for overall risk factors effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determines the driver of a vehicle using data from vehicle and external sensors, gathers contextual data, and predicts driver actions, utilizing cloud computing to integrate and analyze biometric, environmental, and vehicle data to provide real-time insights and preventative measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If telematics systems only transmit signals and messages to and from the vehicle, then the system complexity is low, but the analysis capability is insufficient due to missing context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontext informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple data sources including vehicle sensors, external sensors, telematics data, and contextual information into a unified analysis system. This merging of previously separate data streams enables comprehensive driver behavior analysis while maintaining manageable system complexity through integrated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is designed to handle multiple types of data (biometric, environmental, vehicle performance, contextual) and perform multiple functions (driver identification, behavior prediction, risk assessment, safety intervention). This multi-functional approach allows a single system to address various aspects of driver safety without requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If telematics systems analyze events during transit, then the analysis capability is improved, but the overall risk assessment is insufficient due to missing context

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevent analysis accuracyVSAvoidoverall risk assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary driver identification and context gathering before analyzing specific events. By establishing baseline driver profiles and collecting contextual information in advance, the system enables more accurate real-time event analysis and more reliable overall risk assessment when events occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously collects data from multiple sources, analyzes driver behavior, and uses this feedback to refine risk assessments and predictions. The integrated analysis of telematics data, sensor data, and contextual information creates a feedback loop that improves both event analysis precision and overall risk assessment reliability over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of information

If the system integrates data from multiple sensors and sources, then the contextual information is improved, but the data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual data completenessVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments data processing into distinct modules: driver identification, context gathering, behavior prediction, and risk assessment. Each module processes specific types of data from the multi-sensor system, reducing the complexity of handling integrated data from multiple sources by dividing the processing task into manageable segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Productivity

If the system predicts driver actions in real-time, then the safety intervention capability is improved, but the computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety intervention speedVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system focuses computational resources on predicting specific critical driver actions and behaviors that pose safety risks, rather than attempting to predict all possible driver actions. This partial action approach maintains real-time safety intervention capability while reducing overall computational energy requirements by concentrating processing power on high-priority predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10272921B2Enriched connected car analysis services
Publication Date: 2019.04.30 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10272921B2 patent drawing
  • US10272921B2 patent drawing
  • US10272921B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Contextualizing vehicle data and predicting real-time driver actions. By unsiloing collected data relating to a driver, the actions of the driver can be predicted and the reasons for variations from the predicted actions can be determined based on the contextualized data.