Connected-Vehicle Guidance to Prevent Triggered Unsafe Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing technologies fail to effectively prevent unsafe driving behaviors in real-time, as aggressive or distracted drivers often ignore warnings, leading to potential road-rage incidents and collisions.

Innovation Solution

A connected-vehicle system that predicts potential triggering actions by one driver that could induce undesirable habits in others, generating guidance to control vehicle operations to prevent such actions, leveraging machine learning and distributed computing among networked vehicles to adjust driving behaviors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If real-time detection and guidance systems are implemented to predict and prevent triggering actions, then unsafe driving situations can be prevented, but system complexity and computational requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of traffic situationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the complex safety problem into separate functional modules: detection module for identifying driving behaviors, prediction module for analyzing potential triggering actions, and guidance module for generating preventive instructions. This segmentation allows each module to handle specific tasks independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary detection and prediction of potential unsafe situations before they actually occur. By identifying driving behaviors and predicting triggering actions in advance, the system can issue preventive guidance instructions proactively, preventing unsafe situations rather than reacting to them after they happen

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If machine learning algorithms are used to predict driving habits and triggering actions, then prediction accuracy improves, but processing time and computational energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies machine learning algorithms selectively to specific driving behaviors and situations that are most likely to result in unsafe conditions. Rather than continuously analyzing all driving data, the system focuses computational resources on partial cases that require prediction, reducing overall processing time while maintaining high accuracy for critical situations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from detected driving behaviors and prediction outcomes to continuously refine and update its machine learning models. This feedback mechanism allows the system to improve prediction accuracy over time while adapting to new driving patterns, optimizing the balance between accuracy and processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If connected-vehicle technology is deployed across multiple vehicles to share driving habit data, then prediction reliability improves, but data privacy concerns and communication overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoiddata privacy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes and analyzes driving behavior data locally within each vehicle's own system rather than centrally collecting raw data from all vehicles. Each vehicle maintains local control over its data, allowing prediction reliability to improve through distributed analysis while preserving data privacy through localized processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that processes and anonymizes driving behavior data before sharing it across the vehicle network. This intermediary mechanism enables reliable predictions through data sharing while protecting driver privacy by removing personally identifiable information and using aggregated, anonymized datasets

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20260073794A1Systems and methods for preventing unsafe driving behavior
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 TOYOTA MOTOR ENG & MFG NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US20260073794A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073794A1 patent drawing
  • US20260073794A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for preventing unsafe driving behavior are disclosed herein. One embodiment of an unsafe driving behavior prevention system detects a traffic situation in which a potential triggering action by one or more connected-vehicle drivers is predicted to trigger an undesirable driving habit of another driver. The system also generates guidance for the one or more connected-vehicle drivers regarding control of their respective connected vehicles to prevent the one or more connected-vehicle drivers from carrying out the potential triggering action. The system also transmits the guidance to the one or more connected-vehicle drivers to prevent an unsafe traffic situation by preventing triggering of the undesirable driving habit.