Connectivity-Aware Vehicle Navigation Using Geo-Tagged Network Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional navigation systems prioritize distance and travel time over wireless connectivity, failing to provide routes that ensure consistent network quality, call reliability, and service availability, which is crucial for users needing reliable communication and data services during travel.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a user interface, a local database for geotagged wireless connectivity data, and a route determination engine within a vehicle, allowing users to input connectivity preferences and determine optimal routes based on factors like signal strength, call drops, and service availability, using both local and remote data sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional navigation systems prioritize distance and travel time, then route efficiency is improved, but wireless connectivity reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute efficiencyVSAvoidwireless connectivity reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the routing parameters from traditional distance and time-based metrics to include wireless connectivity quality metrics. The system collects geotagged wireless connectivity data (signal strength, call drops, data rates) and uses these parameters to determine optimal routes that satisfy user-specified connectivity preferences while maintaining reasonable travel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a new dimension to route selection by incorporating wireless connectivity quality as a routing criterion alongside traditional distance and time. This transforms the routing problem from a two-dimensional optimization (distance-time tradeoff) to a three-dimensional problem that includes connectivity reliability, allowing users to prioritize communication quality during travel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If navigation systems collect and process geotagged wireless connectivity data, then connectivity reliability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnectivity reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection by gathering wireless connectivity information (signal strength, call drop statistics, data rates) at various geolocations before route determination is needed. This pre-collected geotagged data is stored locally, enabling fast route calculation without real-time data collection during navigation, thus reducing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a specialized route determination engine that acts as an intermediary between traditional navigation systems and wireless connectivity data. This engine processes connectivity preferences and geotagged data to generate routes that satisfy connectivity requirements, isolating the complexity of connectivity analysis from the core navigation functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If users specify detailed wireless connectivity preferences, then service quality is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice qualityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system allows users to specify connectivity preferences at different levels of detail. Users can provide minimal preferences (e.g., priority network type) for simple operation, or detailed preferences (signal strength thresholds, maximum call drop rates, data rate requirements) when service quality is paramount. The route determination engine handles both levels gracefully.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where users can review proposed routes with their connectivity characteristics and adjust preferences based on actual experience. The system learns from user corrections and preferences, adapting to provide better default recommendations over time, thus improving ease of operation while maintaining service quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10921141B2Geo-tagged mobile network information for intelligent navigation
Publication Date: 2021.02.16 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • US10921141B2 patent drawing
  • US10921141B2 patent drawing
  • US10921141B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In embodiments, an apparatus for providing wireless connectivity based routing for a vehicle may include a user interface to receive one or more wireless connectivity preferences and a navigation request from a user and to display a recommended route to a destination for the user, the recommended route to meet the one or more wireless connectivity preferences while the vehicle follows the recommended route to the destination. The apparatus may further include a local database to store geotagged wireless connectivity data for various geolocations, collected by one or more geotagged wireless connectivity scanners of the vehicle, and a route determination engine coupled to the user interface and to the local database to determine the recommended route, wherein the user interface, the local database and the route determination engine are disposed in the vehicle.