Connector Housing Retaining Arm Slanting Surface Design
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
The existing connector housing designs often result in striking abutment issues when inserting metal terminals, leading to inefficiencies and potential incomplete connections due to the high load on the lance beak, which can cause shaving and incomplete insertion.
Innovation Solution
The connector housing features a retaining arm with a convex retaining portion having a central slanting surface and gentler side slanting surfaces, reducing the inclination angle to prevent striking abutment and ensuring smooth insertion while maintaining effective retention.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a conventional lance beak design with a single slanting surface is used, then the retaining structure is simple, but striking abutment occurs during metal terminal insertion causing incomplete connections
Solution Approach 1:
The lance beak retaining portion is segmented into multiple slanting surfaces (first slanting surface, second slanting surface, and third slanting surface) with different inclination angles. This segmentation allows each surface to perform a specific function: the first surface guides initial insertion, the second surface prevents striking abutment with a gentler angle, and the third surface ensures proper retention. This resolves the contradiction by improving connection reliability through functional segmentation while managing the increased structural complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
Different regions of the lance beak are given different local qualities through varying slanting angles. The first slanting surface has a steeper angle for guidance, the second slanting surface has a gentler angle to prevent striking abutment, and the third slanting surface provides retention. This local differentiation of geometric properties allows the single retaining arm structure to perform multiple functions, improving reliability without requiring multiple separate components.
2Productivity
If a steep slanting surface is used on the lance beak, then the retaining force is strong, but insertion speed decreases due to striking abutment
Solution Approach 1:
The insertion process is segmented into phases handled by different slanting surfaces. The first slanting surface handles initial contact with a moderate angle, while the second slanting surface with a gentler angle specifically addresses the striking abutment phase. This segmentation allows the system to distribute the insertion load across multiple surfaces, preventing the high peak forces that cause striking abutment and enabling faster, smoother insertion.
Solution Approach 2:
The second slanting surface is designed with a gentler inclination angle than would be minimally required for retention alone. This excessive gentleness beyond what is strictly necessary prevents striking abutment by reducing the load peak, thereby enabling faster insertion speeds without compromising the retaining function of the third slanting surface.
3Manufacturing precision
If a single slanting surface design is used, then manufacturing is simple, but shaving occurs leading to incomplete insertion
Solution Approach 1:
The lance beak is segmented into multiple slanting surfaces that can be manufactured as integrated features of a single molded or machined component. While the geometry is more complex than a single surface, the segmentation is achieved through conventional manufacturing processes, and the resulting precision in preventing shaving and ensuring complete insertion outweighs the moderate increase in manufacturing complexity.
Solution Approach 2:
The different slanting surfaces provide locally optimized geometric qualities that prevent shaving during insertion. The gentler second slanting surface specifically prevents the high-load striking abutment that causes shaving, while the other surfaces provide guidance and retention. This local geometric optimization ensures complete insertion without requiring post-manufacturing adjustments.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This design reduces the occurrence of striking abutment, enhances insertion efficiency, prevents shaving, and ensures complete electrical connections by allowing smoother metal terminal insertion and proper retention.
Implementation Method 1
a pair of second slanting surfaces formed respectively at opposite side portions to the central portion, the second slanting surfaces being gentler in inclination angle than the first slanting surface
Data Source
AI summary
This invention provides with a connector housing in which a retaining arm for fixing a metal terminal to be inserted into a receiving chamber is formed within the receiving chamber, and extends in a direction of insertion of the metal terminal, and the retaining arm has a convex retaining portion to be engaged with a predetermined retaining hole formed in the metal terminal, wherein the retaining portion has a first slanting surface formed at a central portion of the retaining portion in a direction perpendicular to the direction of insertion of the metal terminal, and a pair of second slanting surfaces formed respectively at opposite side portions to the central portion, the second slanting surfaces being gentler in inclination angle than the first slanting surface; and at an arbitrary position in the direction of extending of the retaining arm in a range in which the first slanting surface is disposed above a predetermined height, the second slanting surfaces are disposed lower than the first slanting surface.


