Connector Insert Structure to Prevent Basket Finger Deformation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Telecommunications connectors, such as 4.3-10 connectors, are prone to damage and improper connections due to geometric similarities with other types of connectors, leading to costly equipment failures when Linemen attempt to connect incompatible components, especially the Mini-Din connector, which can cause plastic deformation and damage to the outer conductor basket.

Innovation Solution

A protective insert is placed between the inner conductor socket and the outer conductor basket, featuring a corrugated, pedal-shaped structure with engagement and stiffening sections that prevent plastic deformation of the axially projecting fingers by inhibiting the insertion of non-mating connectors and ensuring proper alignment, thus maintaining the elastic properties of the basket fingers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a protective insert is added to prevent damage to outer conductor basket fingers, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector reliabilityVSAvoidconnector structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A protective insert is introduced as an intermediary component between the inner conductor socket and outer conductor basket. This insert features a corrugated pedal-shaped structure with engagement sections that interact with the basket fingers, preventing them from being forced outward by incompatible connectors while maintaining proper electrical connectivity for mating connectors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The protective insert is divided into multiple functional segments: engagement sections that interface with individual basket fingers, stiffening sections that provide structural support, and a corrugated body that allows controlled deformation. This segmentation enables each part to perform its specific protective function independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Strength

If the outer conductor basket fingers are made more robust to resist deformation, then strength is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebasket finger resistance to deformationVSAvoidconnector manufacturing difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of making the entire outer conductor basket more robust, the protective insert provides localized reinforcement only where needed - at the engagement sections that interface with vulnerable basket fingers. The insert's corrugated structure offers high stiffness-to-weight ratio, providing local strength without requiring thick-walled or overly robust basket construction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The protective insert combines multiple material properties within a single component: the corrugated structure provides both flexibility for mating operations and stiffness for protection, while the integrated design combines structural support and electrical isolation functions in one element, simplifying the overall manufacturing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Ease of manufacture

If the connector structure is simplified to reduce cost, then ease of manufacture is improved, but reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector manufacturing simplicityVSAvoidprotection against improper connection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The protective insert serves multiple functions simultaneously: it protects basket fingers from deformation by incompatible connectors, provides structural support to the inner conductor socket, maintains proper alignment during mating operations, and prevents direct contact between the outer conductor basket and incompatible connectors. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional separate protective components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If the basket fingers are made more flexible to ensure proper connection, then ease of operation is improved, but object-affected harmful factors worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector mating easeVSAvoidvulnerability to damage from improper connection
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protective insert is installed beforehand to cushion and absorb the harmful forces generated by incompatible connectors before they can reach and damage the basket fingers. The corrugated structure of the insert allows it to deform elastically during improper insertion attempts, preventing force transmission to the vulnerable basket fingers while still permitting proper mating operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS11923633B2Connector and connector insert for protecting conductor spring-elements
Publication Date: 2024.03.05 JOHN MEZZALINGUA ASSOC LLC
  • US11923633B2 patent drawing
  • US11923633B2 patent drawing
  • US11923633B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A connector, and connector insert, configured to inhibit plastic deformation of at least one of the axially projecting fingers of an outer conductor basket associated with a connector. The connector insert comprises: (i) an outwardly facing flange configured to engage a shoulder formed at a base of the axially projecting fingers of the outer conductor basket, (ii) a tubular structure defining an elongate axis and having plurality of engagement sections extending normal to the outwardly facing flange, each engagement section having a surface disposed substantially normally to a radial projecting from the elongate axis; and (iii) a plurality of stiffening sections having a surface disposed substantially parallel to a radial projecting from the elongate axis. The engagement sections function to prevent plastic deformation of the axially projecting fingers, thereby preventing damage to the fingers and/or the transmission of RF signals The stiffening sections function to support the engagement sections while furthermore preventing the insertion of a non-mating second connector into, or against, the outer conductor basket of a first connector.