Automotive Electrical Connector Retainer Hinge Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing connector members for electrical wires in automobiles face challenges in durability and reliability due to hinge fracture and interference issues when mating, particularly as connectors are downsized, leading to poor retention of terminals and potential failure in connection.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a lance housing with guide walls and a retainer that is swingably connected, featuring a recess and locking protrusions to prevent hinge fracture and ensure smooth mating by engaging with the mating connector's recesses, thereby enhancing durability and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If the connector is downsized, then the size of the connector is reduced, but the ability to prevent terminals from dropping off deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector sizeVSAvoidterminal retention ability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The connector is divided into two separate housings: a first housing for receiving terminals and a second housing for mating with the opposite connector. This segmentation allows each housing to be optimized independently, enabling downsizing while maintaining terminal retention through the retainer mechanism in the first housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A retainer is introduced as an intermediary component between the terminals and the first housing. The retainer includes a retainer body with a retainer hole and a pressing portion that elastically presses terminals, providing reliable terminal retention even in downsized connectors without requiring larger housing structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If hinges of the retainer are provided, then terminals can be secured in the opening, but the hinges may collide with the housing of the mating connector and be fractured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal securing abilityVSAvoidhinge durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The hinges are extracted from the retainer body and integrated into the first housing instead. The retainer is now swingably connected to the first housing via hinges formed on the housing itself, removing the vulnerable external hinges from the retainer that would collide with the mating connector.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The hinge function is merged with the first housing structure. The hinges are formed as integral parts of the first housing rather than separate components on the retainer, combining the housing and hinge into a single robust structure that prevents fracture during mating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8636536B2Electrical connector member
Publication Date: 2014.01.28 TE CONNECTIVITY JAPAN GK
  • US8636536B2 patent drawing
  • US8636536B2 patent drawing
  • US8636536B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A connector member that is improved in durability and reliability by preventing fracture of hinges of a retainer and can be smoothly mated with a mating connector. The connector member having a lance housing. a connector housing, and the retainer. The lance housing includes a plurality of terminal receiving slots, a recess disposed at a rear of the plurality of terminal receiving slots and in a portion of the lance housing near a rear surface thereof, and a pair of guide walls positioned opposite each other along a top surface of the lance housing. The connector housing includes a housing recess opening at one side for housing the lance housing. The retainer is fitted into the recess of the lance housing and swingably connected to the lance housing by a hinge.