Vehicle Connector Retainer Locking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing charging connectors for vehicles have complex structures that increase cost and size, making it difficult to achieve effective terminal locking and reduce housing size.

Innovation Solution

A simplified connector design featuring a retainer that moves between non-locking and locking positions, using a locking portion and a lance from the rear housing to secure the terminal, eliminating the need for a lance in the front housing and enhancing sealing performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the housing is formed with a lace for locking the terminal, then the terminal can be locked, but the structure of the housing becomes complicated, leading to increased cost and difficulty in reducing housing size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal lockingVSAvoidhousing structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The lace function is extracted from the housing and transferred to the retainer. The retainer now includes the lace that engages with the terminal, while the housing structure is simplified and no longer requires integrated laces, thus reducing complexity and cost while maintaining locking reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The connector is divided into separate functional components: the housing provides structural support and terminal accommodation, while the retainer provides the locking function through its lace. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the housing is formed with a lace for locking the terminal, then the terminal can be locked, but the housing size increases due to the complicated structure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal lockingVSAvoidhousing size
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lace function is extracted from the housing and placed in the retainer, allowing the housing to be minimized to only the essential terminal accommodating chamber and retainer receiving space, thus reducing housing volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer with its lace is positioned within the housing structure, with the retainer receiving chamber accommodating the retainer. This nesting allows the locking mechanism to be compact and integrated without increasing overall housing volume

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentEP3863122B1connector
Publication Date: 2022.09.21 YAZAKI CORP
  • EP3863122B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3863122B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3863122B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A connector includes a terminal, a housing to accommodate the terminal and a retainer including a locking portion to lock the terminal when the terminal is accommodated in the housing. The housing includes a front housing having a terminal accommodating chamber and a rear housing to be attached to the front housing from a rear side of an insertion direction of the terminal, the rear housing including a lance to, when the terminal is accommodated in the terminal accommodating chamber, lock a rear portion of the terminal. The retainer is to be attached between the front housing and the rear housing and to be displaceable along a direction perpendicular to the insertion direction between a locking position and a non-locking position. The retainer moves from the non-locking position to the locking portion and the locking portion locks the rear portion of the terminal in the insertion direction.