Integration Connector Security Scoring and Runtime Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing integration connectors lack comprehensive security compliance mechanisms, making it challenging for developers to trust and ensure secure data access and communication with target services.

Innovation Solution

A compliance tool that inspects definition data for integration connectors, evaluates compliance with a set of security rules, computes a security score, and enforces security compliance during both design time and run-time operations, including monitoring and stopping non-compliant operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If integration connectors are used to facilitate data access and communication with target services, then connectivity and integration capability are improved, but security compliance and trustworthiness deteriorate due to lack of comprehensive security mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoidsecurity compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary security validation by inspecting definition data of integration connectors against security rules before deployment. A security score is computed in advance, and connectors must meet minimum security thresholds before being enabled for use, preventing non-compliant connectors from accessing target services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors runtime operations of integration connectors and provides feedback when security rules are violated. The monitoring system detects compliance violations in real-time and stops operations of non-compliant connectors, ensuring ongoing security adherence throughout the connector's lifecycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If security compliance mechanisms are implemented in integration connectors, then security score and compliance reliability are improved, but system complexity increases due to monitoring and enforcement requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity complianceVSAvoidcompliance monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The integration connector performs self-validation by having its definition data automatically inspected against security rules. The system computes security scores autonomously based on predefined criteria, and connectors self-regulate by having their runtime operations automatically monitored and stopped when violations occur, reducing the need for manual security management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The compliance monitoring system serves multiple functions: it validates definition data, computes security scores, monitors runtime operations, detects violations, and stops non-compliant connectors. This multi-functional approach consolidates security management into a single unified system rather than requiring separate mechanisms for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If runtime monitoring and enforcement of security rules is implemented, then security violations are prevented, but operational overhead and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity enforcementVSAvoidoperation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs rapid security validation by skipping detailed inspection of non-critical attributes and focusing primarily on essential security rules. During runtime monitoring, the system quickly detects violations of critical security constraints without performing exhaustive analysis of all operations, enabling fast enforcement decisions that minimize operational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Data Source

PatentUS12511396B2Security compliance in integration connectors
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 ORACLE INT CORP
  • US12511396B2 patent drawing
  • US12511396B2 patent drawing
  • US12511396B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure provide security compliance in integration connectors. In one embodiment, a system receives a definition data specifying implementation details of an integration connector. The system checks by inspecting the definition data, whether the implementation details are in compliance with a set of security rules and computes a security score for the integration connector based on the compliance determined by the checking. According to an aspect, the system displays to a user, the security score for the integration connector along with a set of warnings about the compliance. According to another aspect, the system monitors a run-time operation of the integration connector. In response to identifying, based on the monitoring, that a security rule of the set of security rules has been violated, the system stops the operation of the integration connector and sends an error indicating that the security rule has been violated.