Connector Shielding Walls for Erroneous Insertion and Contaminant Blocking
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Conventional connectors with fewer terminal accommodating chambers than maximum capacity face challenges in preventing contaminant diffusion and avoiding damage to mating terminals when inserted erroneously, as existing countermeasures are labor-intensive and costly, and ineffective in blocking contaminants through engagement gaps.
Innovation Solution
The connector design includes a first shielding wall in empty terminal accommodating chambers to allow erroneous terminal insertion without damage and a second shielding wall to block contaminants, preventing entry through wire withdrawal openings and engagement gaps without additional components.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If hole caps or dummy terminals are fitted into unused terminal accommodating chambers to prevent contaminant entry, then contaminant diffusion is prevented, but labor cost and component cost increase
Solution Approach 1:
The terminal accommodating chamber is divided into two functional zones by a shielding wall: a first space that allows erroneous terminal insertion and a second space that blocks contaminant entry through the wire withdrawal opening. This segmentation eliminates the need for additional hole caps or dummy terminals while maintaining contaminant prevention.
Solution Approach 2:
The connector housing itself provides the protective function through the integrated shielding wall structure, eliminating the need for separate protective components. The shielding wall serves multiple functions: blocking contaminants, allowing erroneous insertion, and maintaining structural integrity, thereby reducing component count and manufacturing complexity.
2Reliability
If a shielding wall is provided to block contaminant entry through the wire withdrawal opening, then contaminant diffusion is prevented, but erroneous terminal insertion may cause damage
Solution Approach 1:
The terminal accommodating chamber is divided into two functional zones by a shielding wall: a first space that allows erroneous terminal insertion and a second space that blocks contaminant entry through the wire withdrawal opening. This segmentation eliminates the need for additional hole caps or dummy terminals while maintaining contaminant prevention.
Solution Approach 2:
The first space in front of the shielding wall acts as a buffer zone that absorbs the impact of erroneously inserted terminals before they reach the shielding wall. This prevents damage to both the terminal and the shielding wall structure while maintaining the contaminant-blocking function.
3Ease of manufacture
If the connector housing structure is simplified to reduce manufacturing cost, then ease of manufacture is improved, but contaminant entry through engagement gaps increases
Solution Approach 1:
The shielding wall is positioned specifically at the wire withdrawal opening where contaminant entry is most critical. This localized protective measure provides effective contaminant blocking without requiring complex sealing structures throughout the entire connector housing, maintaining both simplicity and reliability.
Data Source
AI summary
A female connector housing is provided with a plurality of terminal accommodating chambers. Each of the terminal accommodating chambers is provided, on its front face, with a terminal insertion opening through which a male terminal is to be inserted. Each of the terminal accommodating chambers is provided, on its rear face, with a wire withdrawal opening. In the terminal accommodating chamber which is intended to accommodate no terminal, there are provided a first shielding wall which surrounds an erroneous-insertion allowable space allowing the male terminal to be inserted erroneously and shields the interior of the erroneous-insertion allowable space and a second shielding wall for shielding the wire withdrawal opening.


