Multi-Size Connector Terminal Layout for Compact Spacing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a demand for increasing the degree of freedom in terminal layout and suppressing the increase in size of connectors with multiple terminals of different sizes while maintaining desired distances between them.

Innovation Solution

A connector design that includes multiple terminals arranged in rows with specific width relationships and positional constraints, where the first terminal overlaps with the fourth terminal, and the second terminal overlaps with the third terminal, allowing for flexible layout while maintaining compact size by satisfying specific distance conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If terminals are arranged in a conventional grid pattern with uniform spacing, then manufacturing is simple, but layout flexibility is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout flexibilityVSAvoidterminal arrangement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces overlapping arrangement in the front-back direction (depth dimension) beyond the conventional left-right and front-back row arrangements. By allowing terminals to overlap when viewed from the front-back direction, the design adds a dimensional layer of complexity management, enabling flexible layout of terminals with different widths without increasing connector footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs asymmetric terminal width design where the first terminal has a greater width than the second terminal. This asymmetry is combined with selective overlapping arrangement, creating a non-uniform, optimized layout that maximizes space utilization while maintaining electrical performance and facilitating flexible adapter design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Area of stationary object

If connector size is reduced to accommodate multiple terminals, then compactness is improved, but distance between terminals may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnector footprintVSAvoidinter-terminal distance
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the depth dimension (front-back direction) for terminal arrangement, allowing terminals to be positioned at different depths while maintaining adequate lateral spacing. This three-dimensional arrangement enables compact connector footprint while preserving necessary distances between terminals for reliable electrical connection and signal integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a nested-like overlapping arrangement where narrower terminals (second and third terminals) are positioned to overlap with wider terminals (first and fourth terminals) in the depth direction. This nesting approach allows efficient space utilization, maintaining terminal distances while minimizing overall connector dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

3Adaptability or versatility

If terminals of different sizes are arranged in the same row, then layout flexibility is improved, but maintaining uniform spacing becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterminal layout flexibilityVSAvoidterminal spacing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves spacing consistency issues by transitioning from two-dimensional row-based arrangement to three-dimensional overlapping arrangement. Terminals with different widths are distributed across multiple rows with controlled overlapping in the depth direction, maintaining uniform lateral spacing while accommodating size variations through depth-positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different positioning strategies to different terminal pairs based on their width characteristics. The first and fourth terminals (wider) are positioned with specific overlapping relationships, while the second and third terminals (narrower) are positioned accordingly. This localized quality approach maintains overall spacing consistency while accommodating local size variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12160059B2Connector including multiple terminals having different sizes
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 MURATA MFG CO LTD
  • US12160059B2 patent drawing
  • US12160059B2 patent drawing
  • US12160059B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a connector, first, second, third and fourth terminals are disposed to satisfy conditions (A) and (B): (A) (a1) a left-end of the first terminal is positioned to left of a left-end of the fourth terminal, and a distance between the left-end of the first terminal and the left-end of the fourth terminal in a left-right direction is shorter than a first distance, or (a2) the left-end of the first terminal coincides with the left-end of the fourth terminal in the left-right direction, (B) (b1) a right-end of the second terminal is positioned to left of a right-end of the third terminal, and a distance between the right-end of the second terminal and the right-end of the third terminal in the left-right direction is shorter than a second distance, or (b2) the right-end of the second terminal coincides with the right-end of the third terminal in the left-right direction.