Consensus Assistance System for Meeting Decision Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing communication systems face challenges in facilitating timely consensus and expertise identification among meeting participants, particularly when quorum requirements are not met or when decisions need to be made based on recorded meetings, leading to delays and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A contextually-aware consensus assistance system using agent-assisted response intelligence that analyzes meeting data, including audio, video, and shared files, to generate queries and polls, enabling real-time or subsequent communication with absent team members or experts across multiple platforms to achieve consensus and identify relevant expertise.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual tasks are performed to gather supplemental information and communicate with teammates during a meeting, then decision accuracy may improve, but meeting time is significantly delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision accuracyVSAvoidmeeting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically collecting supplemental information, analyzing it before the meeting, and preparing communication with relevant teammates in advance. This allows decision-making to proceed without time-consuming manual research during the meeting itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An automated assistant system acts as an intermediary between meeting participants and external information sources. The assistant handles information gathering, analysis, and communication tasks, freeing participants from manual tasks while maintaining decision accuracy through comprehensive information availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If all quorum members are required to be present for decision-making, then decision legitimacy is ensured, but decision speed decreases when members are unavailable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision legitimacyVSAvoiddecision speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively reaching out to absent quorum members before the meeting concludes, presenting them with decision options and collecting their input. This ensures their participation is secured in advance, maintaining legitimacy while allowing the meeting to proceed without waiting for their physical presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual extension of the quorum by enabling remote participation through automated communications. Absent members can review meeting content, provide input, and make decisions through digital channels, effectively copying their decision-making capacity to the remote environment without requiring physical attendance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If recorded meetings are reviewed and analyzed manually to ascertain conclusions and consensus, then accurate understanding is achieved, but considerable time is consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunderstanding accuracyVSAvoidreview time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual review and analysis of recorded meetings with automated artificial intelligence processing. The AI analyzes video, audio, and transcription data to identify conclusions, consensus, and key discussion points, achieving accurate understanding without the time investment required for human review.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The meeting system provides self-service by automatically generating summaries, identifying action items, and extracting consensus points from recorded meetings without requiring manual intervention. This allows participants to obtain accurate understanding of meeting outcomes immediately after the meeting concludes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive data collection from multiple sources is performed to identify expert knowledge, then expertise identification accuracy improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexpertise identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using a single integrated platform that simultaneously collects data from multiple sources including meeting transcripts, participant profiles, organizational databases, and external knowledge repositories. This universal system handles diverse data types through unified processing mechanisms, improving expertise identification without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10558827B2Automatic method and system for identifying consensus and resources
Publication Date: 2020.02.11 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US10558827B2 patent drawing
  • US10558827B2 patent drawing
  • US10558827B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Implementations may provide contextually-aware expertise or decision-making assistance for meeting participants. A system may include a computerized or automated assistant to help participants of a communication session to identify individuals having expertise related to a topic discussed during the communication session. The system, through the use of an agent-assisted response intelligence observing the communication session, may identify that meeting participants require assistance or expertise on a discussed topic. The agent-assisted response intelligence may reach out to individuals to ascertain if they have the expertise related to the discussed topic.