Consent Receipt Management System for Privacy Compliance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective methods for managing consent and personal data processing, particularly in ensuring compliance with privacy and security policies, leading to frequent breaches and unauthorized access to sensitive information.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented data processing method and system for managing consent receipts, which involves generating unique consent receipt keys, storing and associating subject identifiers, transaction identifiers, and user interface captures, and transmitting consent receipts to data subjects, while also enabling data inventory generation, cookie consent optimization, and automated process blocking based on consent data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual consent tracking methods are used, then system complexity is reduced, but data privacy security and compliance reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a consent management system as an intermediary between data subjects and data processors. This system automatically tracks consent preferences, generates consent receipts, and enforces consent rules across multiple systems. The intermediary handles the complexity of consent management internally, providing simple API interfaces to external systems while ensuring comprehensive compliance tracking and security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The consent management system enables self-service capabilities where data subjects can autonomously manage their consent preferences through user interfaces. The system automatically updates consent status, notifies relevant systems of consent changes, and generates audit trails without requiring manual intervention. This self-service approach improves compliance reliability by ensuring consistent enforcement while reducing the operational burden on organizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If comprehensive consent tracking is implemented, then data privacy security improves, but processing time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata privacy securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by obtaining and storing consent information upfront before data processing occurs. Consent receipts are generated and stored in advance, containing all necessary consent metadata and preferences. When data processing is requested, the system quickly retrieves pre-validated consent information rather than performing complex verification during processing, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining comprehensive security tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual consent verification processes with automated electronic systems. Instead of manual review and tracking of consent documents, the system uses digital consent receipts with machine-readable formats, automated validation logic, and programmatic enforcement rules. This substitution eliminates time-consuming manual operations while maintaining rigorous privacy security standards through consistent automated application of consent requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated consent management systems are deployed, then compliance efficiency improves, but initial implementation cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance efficiencyVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The consent management system is designed as a universal platform that can serve multiple functions across different organizational needs. It handles various types of consent (data processing, marketing, cookies), supports multiple data subjects and processors, and adapts to different regulatory requirements through configurable policies. This multi-functionality consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate systems into a single unified solution, improving compliance efficiency while managing implementation complexity through standardized architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary layer between existing organizational systems and consent management requirements. Rather than requiring complete system replacement, it integrates with existing data processing systems through APIs and standard protocols. This intermediary approach allows organizations to maintain their current technology stack while adding comprehensive consent management capabilities, reducing implementation complexity and cost compared to building a completely new system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11416636B2Data processing consent management systems and related methods
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 ONETRUST LLC
  • US11416636B2 patent drawing
  • US11416636B2 patent drawing
  • US11416636B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, a personal data processing system may require guardian consent (e.g., parental consent) for a data subject in order to collect, store, and or process the subject's personal data. The system may prompt the data subject to initiate a request for guardian consent or the system may initiate a request for guardian consent without initiation from the data subject (e.g., in the background of a transaction). In some embodiments, the system may require guardian consent when a data subject is under the age for valid consent for the particular type of personal data that will be collected as part of a particular transaction. Data processing systems may generate and store one or more consent records memorializing valid consent for data processing from data subjects and/or from guardians on their behalf (e.g., in the case of a minor data subject).