Consistency Ensemble for Reliable Multi-Model NLP Responses

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing natural language processing systems suffer from inconsistencies and variability in responses due to reliance on single-model approaches, lacking adaptability and precision, and fail to accommodate varied user needs and contexts.

Innovation Solution

A scalable consistency ensemble (SCE) framework that leverages multiple machine learning models to generate consistent output responses by evaluating and integrating responses based on semantic consistency evaluations, using a prompt-based approach to reduce computational complexity and select the most consistent responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple machine learning models are used to generate responses, then response reliability and consistency are improved, but computational complexity and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse consistencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the response generation process into distinct phases: (1) parallel inference phase where multiple models generate initial responses independently, (2) consistency evaluation phase where responses are compared and ranked, and (3) selection phase where top-k consistent responses are chosen. This segmentation allows computational tasks to be distributed and optimized at each stage, reducing overall complexity while maintaining reliability benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary consistency evaluation by comparing responses from multiple models before final selection. By pre-evaluating semantic consistency and ranking responses in advance, the system avoids computationally expensive post-processing and enables faster final decision-making, thus reducing total computational burden while ensuring reliable output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If multiple machine learning models are used to generate responses, then response reliability is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse consistencyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides processing into parallel independent inference steps followed by sequential evaluation. Multiple models generate responses simultaneously in parallel, then consistency checking and ranking are performed in a streamlined sequential manner. This segmentation minimizes sequential dependencies and reduces total processing time while maintaining the reliability benefits of multiple models.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a top-k selection mechanism where only the k most consistent responses are fully processed and evaluated, rather than exhaustively analyzing all possible model outputs. This partial processing approach significantly reduces computation time while still ensuring high reliability by focusing resources on the most promising consistent responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If semantic consistency evaluation is performed across all intermediate responses, then response accuracy is improved, but computational burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic consistency accuracyVSAvoidcomputational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs semantic consistency evaluation selectively rather than exhaustively. It implements a ranking mechanism that identifies and focuses evaluation resources on the top-k responses with highest consistency scores, rather than uniformly processing all intermediate responses. This partial evaluation approach maintains high measurement precision for the most relevant responses while significantly reducing overall computational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different evaluation depths to different responses based on their consistency rankings. High-ranking consistent responses receive thorough semantic evaluation, while lower-ranking responses receive minimal or no evaluation. This local quality differentiation ensures accurate consistency measurement where it matters most while conserving computational resources on less critical responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12585880B2Scalable consistency ensemble for machine learning models
Publication Date: 2026.03.24 INTUIT INC
  • US12585880B2 patent drawing
  • US12585880B2 patent drawing
  • US12585880B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Certain aspects of the disclosure provide a method for generating a final output response. The method may include receiving an input; generating a plurality of intermediate responses to the input using a plurality of machine learning models, wherein each machine learning model of the plurality of machine learning models generates at least one intermediate response based on the input; generating a semantic consistency metric for each respective intermediate response of the plurality of intermediate responses by performing a comparison between the respective intermediate response and other intermediate responses of the plurality of intermediate responses; selecting a subset of the plurality of intermediate responses based on the semantic consistency metric of each respective intermediate response of the plurality of intermediate responses; and generating a final output response based on the subset of the plurality of intermediate responses.