Consortium Blockchain Authentication for Endpoint Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing endpoint code signing solutions are centralized, inflexible, and costly, relying on single-point authorization and requiring personal information from developers, with limited accessibility to smaller projects and open-source communities.

Innovation Solution

A decentralized and self-sovereign identity-based authentication system using a consortium-based infrastructure and blockchain technology, which verifies the authenticity of endpoint devices through a shared digital wallet and blockchain ledger network, enabling flexible and scalable authorization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If centralized code signing solutions are used, then authentication and authorization can be provided, but flexibility and accessibility are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization flexibilityVSAvoidcentralized infrastructure dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized authorization system is segmented into distributed autonomous nodes. Each endpoint device maintains its own digital wallet and credentials, eliminating the single-point authorization bottleneck. The system divides the authorization function across multiple independent entities, allowing flexible access control without centralized coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A blockchain network serves as an intermediary layer that enables trustless verification between endpoint devices. Instead of direct centralized control, the blockchain mediates the authorization process by providing immutable verification of digital credentials, allowing flexible authorization while maintaining system-wide trust.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If personal information is collected for vendor authorization, then authentication can be provided, but privacy is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication reliabilityVSAvoidpersonal information exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

Personal information is extracted and replaced with cryptographic digital credentials. The system removes the need to store or transmit actual personal data by using public-key cryptography, where only cryptographic proofs of identity are exchanged, maintaining authentication reliability without personal information exposure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Endpoint devices autonomously manage their own digital identities and credentials through self-sovereign identity mechanisms. Each device generates and controls its own cryptographic key pairs and digital credentials without requiring personal information submission to vendors, enabling self-service authentication that protects privacy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If single-point authorization is used, then simplified control is achieved, but system resilience is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthorization control simplicityVSAvoidsystem resilience
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single-point authorization control is segmented into distributed authorization capabilities at each endpoint. Each device independently verifies credentials through blockchain, maintaining simple operational control while eliminating the single-point failure risk through distribution across multiple autonomous nodes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The authorization model transitions from centralized control parameters to decentralized cryptographic verification parameters. This parameter change maintains the simplicity of authorization decisions while fundamentally improving resilience by removing the central point of failure through cryptographic proof-based verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250181701A1Consortium-based application authentication
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 KYNDRYL INC
  • US20250181701A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181701A1 patent drawing
  • US20250181701A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an aspect of the disclosure, there is a computer-implemented method including: obtaining, by a computing device, a request from an endpoint device to access at least one system resource; obtaining, by the computing device, a digital certificate from a shared digital wallet; obtaining, by the computing device, a validation result associated with the digital certificate from a blockchain ledger network; determining, by the computing device, whether the validation result authorizes access to the at least one system resource by the endpoint device; and sending authorization to the endpoint to deny or permit the endpoint device access to the at least one system resource based on the validation result.