Constant Cache Banking and Unified Messaging for Latency Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing graphics processing systems face high latency and complex compiler access models in managing constant caches, which leads to sub-optimal performance due to inability to determine the impact of caching different constants on system performance.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a constant cache management system with a single level of hierarchy and simplified access, using intelligent banking and unified messaging to dynamically manage which constants are cached, thereby improving access times and overall system performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If traditional constant cache management is used, then the system can store constant data, but the latency for retrieving constant data is high (approximately 32 clocks)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstant data access latencyVSAvoidcache management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The constant cache is divided into multiple banks (e.g., 8 banks) that can be accessed in parallel. Each bank handles specific constant data, allowing simultaneous access to different constants without sequential delays. This segmentation reduces the effective access latency by enabling parallel retrieval operations across multiple cache banks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension of cache organization by implementing a banked structure with multiple independent cache banks instead of a single sequential cache. This dimensional change from a single-cache architecture to a multi-bank architecture enables parallel access paths, effectively reducing latency without proportionally increasing control complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If traditional constant cache management is used, then the cache can store constants, but the compiler access model becomes complex requiring differentiation among access types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompiler access model simplicityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The unified constant cache model accepts all constant access requests through a single interface, regardless of the constant type or access pattern. The banked cache structure automatically routes different access types to appropriate banks without requiring the compiler to implement complex access models. This universal interface simplifies the compiler while the hardware handles the complexity of differentiated access internally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The constant cache system includes automatic cacheability determination logic that evaluates and decides which constants should be cached without requiring explicit compiler directives or complex compiler analysis. The system self-determines cacheability based on constant characteristics and access patterns, reducing the burden on the compiler and simplifying the access model while maintaining optimal caching behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If traditional constant cache management is used, then the system can cache constants, but it cannot determine how caching different constants affects system performance leading to cache thrashing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem performanceVSAvoidcacheability information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The constant cache management system incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor cache hit rates, access patterns, and constant usage frequency. Based on this feedback, the system dynamically adjusts which constants remain in cache and which are evicted. The feedback loop continuously optimizes cache contents to maximize system performance by retaining frequently accessed constants and evicting less useful ones, preventing cache thrashing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The cache management system dynamically adapts its caching decisions based on runtime observations of constant access patterns. Instead of static caching rules, the system continuously evaluates constant usage and adjusts cache contents in real-time. This dynamic behavior allows the system to respond to changing workload requirements and maintain optimal cache utilization for varying performance conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12333306B2High performance constant cache and constant access mechanisms
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 INTEL CORP
  • US12333306B2 patent drawing
  • US12333306B2 patent drawing
  • US12333306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A graphics processing apparatus includes a graphics processor and a constant cache. The graphics processor has a number of execution instances that will generate requests for constant data from the constant cache. The constant cache stores constants of multiple constant types. The constant cache has a single level of hierarchy to store the constant data. The constant cache has a banking structure based on the number of execution instances, where the execution instances generate requests for the constant data with unified messaging that is the same for the different types of constant data.