Parallel Processing Request Coalescing for Constant-Data Multicast

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional parallel processing units (PPUs) face bandwidth issues and complexity in servicing multiple threads requesting the same constant data, leading to inefficiencies in writeback bandwidth and increased latency due to address matching and synchronization requirements.

Innovation Solution

A PPU employs a request coalescer to coalesce writeback requests using reduced bit identifiers, leveraging generic writeback buffers to multicast constant data to uniform registers without synchronizing individual cores, thereby reducing bandwidth requirements and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional parallel processing units service multiple threads requesting the same constant data individually, then each thread receives its data, but bandwidth consumption increases and latency increases due to address matching and synchronization requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata delivery completenessVSAvoidbandwidth consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple identical writeback requests into a single multicast operation. When multiple threads request the same constant data, the system combines these requests and delivers the data once to all requesting threads simultaneously, rather than servicing each thread individually. This merging approach maintains complete data delivery to all threads while dramatically reducing bandwidth consumption by eliminating redundant data transmissions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a universal writeback mechanism that can handle both individual thread requests and multicast requests to multiple threads. The system uses a request coalescer that identifies when multiple threads request the same data and automatically switches to a multicast mode, making the writeback mechanism universally applicable to different request patterns. This multi-functionality allows the system to optimize bandwidth usage dynamically based on request patterns while ensuring all threads receive their required data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional parallel processing units service multiple threads requesting the same constant data with address matching and synchronization, then data is delivered to all threads, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata delivery completenessVSAvoidwriteback process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the address matching and synchronization functions from the individual thread writeback process and consolidates them into a centralized request coalescer. This coalescer pre-processes writeback requests, identifies identical data requests, and groups them together before the actual data transfer. By taking out these complex functions and centralizing them, the system reduces the complexity burden on individual thread handling paths while ensuring complete and synchronized data delivery to all requesting threads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary analysis and grouping of writeback requests before the actual data transfer occurs. The request coalescer examines incoming writeback requests, identifies when multiple threads request the same constant data, and prepares a consolidated multicast operation in advance. This preliminary action eliminates the need for complex real-time address matching and synchronization during the critical data transfer phase, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining data delivery reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of energy

If reduced bit identifiers are used to coalesce writeback requests, then bandwidth requirements decrease and process simplification occurs, but request identification capability must be maintained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth consumptionVSAvoidrequest identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses compact identifiers that capture the essential information needed to identify unique data requests without requiring full address information. Instead of copying or transmitting complete memory addresses, the system uses reduced-bit identifiers that uniquely identify constant data requests. These identifiers are sufficient for the request coalescer to group identical requests together while using significantly fewer bits than full addresses, thereby reducing bandwidth consumption while maintaining accurate request identification and grouping capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250291726A1Systems and methods for multicasting data
Publication Date: 2025.09.18 NVIDIA CORP
  • US20250291726A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291726A1 patent drawing
  • US20250291726A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A first instruction to load a first data into a first register file associated with a first subpartition unit is received. A second instruction to load the first data into a second register file associated with a second subpartition unit is received. The first instruction and the second instruction are coalesced into a first entry of a request coalescer based on instruction identifiers. The first entry is associated with the first data. Responsive to a determination that the first data is available in the cache, the first data is multicast from the cache to the first register file and the second register file.