Stress Intensity Factor Calculation Using Constrained Crack Tip Zones

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current finite element methods for crack analysis require specialized crack tip elements and complex post-processing to accurately determine stress intensity factors, limiting their application due to the need for fine meshes and specialized software, which restricts the wider use of fracture mechanics in engineering.

Innovation Solution

The method involves defining a constrained crack tip zone within a finite element model using multi-point constraint equations and generalized crack tip zone stiffness, allowing stress intensity factor calculation without specialized elements or complex post-processing, using standard finite element software.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If specialized crack tip elements are used to accurately model the stress singularity at the crack tip, then measurement precision of stress intensity factor is improved, but device complexity and ease of operation deteriorate due to requiring specialized elements and post-processing algorithms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress intensity factorVSAvoidfinite element model
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the crack tip zone from the finite element model and replaces it with a mechanism that mimics its reaction. This removes the need for specialized crack tip elements while preserving the stress singularity behavior, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary mechanism (springs or dampers) that mediates between the surrounding structure and the crack tip zone. This intermediary captures the essential stress concentration effect without requiring complex specialized elements, simplifying the overall model while maintaining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If an extremely fine mesh is used at the crack tip to reproduce the stress gradient, then measurement precision is improved, but productivity and ease of manufacture deteriorate due to increased modeling complexity and computational cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress intensity factorVSAvoidanalysis efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By extracting and replacing the crack tip zone with a simplified mechanism, the patent eliminates the need for extremely fine meshing in that region. This dramatically reduces the total number of elements required in the model, improving productivity while maintaining measurement precision through the mechanistic representation of stress concentration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Measurement precision

If specialized post-processing algorithms are used to extract stress intensity factors, then measurement precision is improved, but ease of operation and accessibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestress intensity factorVSAvoidcrack analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the finite element model self-service by incorporating the stress intensity factor calculation capability directly into the structural model through the crack tip zone mechanism. The stress intensity factor emerges naturally from the model response without requiring separate post-processing algorithms, making the analysis accessible to engineers using standard software

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Ease of operation

If standard finite element software is used without specialized elements, then ease of operation and accessibility are improved, but measurement precision deteriorates due to inability to capture stress singularity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrack analysisVSAvoidstress intensity factor
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the specialized crack tip zone mechanism only at the crack tip location while using standard elements elsewhere in the structure. This localized approach enables standard software to achieve accurate stress intensity factor measurements without requiring specialized elements throughout the entire model, balancing ease of operation with measurement precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS8688415B2Systems and methods for performing stress intensity factor calculations using non-singular finite elements
Publication Date: 2014.04.01 KELLOGG BROWN & ROOT INC
  • US8688415B2 patent drawing
  • US8688415B2 patent drawing
  • US8688415B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for determining stress intensity factors. In one or more embodiments, the method can include the steps of defining a crack tip zone about one or more crack tips of one or more arbitrarily shaped cracks in an arbitrarily shaped solid. The one or more crack tip zones can be constrained within a finite element model representation mesh of the arbitrarily shaped solid to provide one or more constrained crack tip zones. The combination of the finite element model representation mesh and the one or more constrained crack tip zones can be processed to determine the stress intensity factor for each of the one or more arbitrarily shaped cracks.