Constraint-Based Albuming Layout Generation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing digital image albuming systems lack flexibility in generating layouts without predefined templates, limiting user control over the relative sizes of image-based graphic elements and line breaks for textual elements, and often result in tedious and time-consuming manual processes.

Innovation Solution

A machine-implemented method for albuming graphic elements that identifies candidate relative layouts, generates constraints describing layout relationships, and determines a final layout based on both local and global aspects of the page, allowing for flexible determination of graphic element sizes and placements without relying on predefined templates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If predefined templates are used for album layout, then layout generation is simplified and faster, but flexibility and user control over graphic element sizes are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelayout generation speedVSAvoidflexibility in graphic element sizing
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes from fixed template parameters to variable constraint parameters. Instead of using predefined template structures, the system allows users to define flexible constraints on graphic element sizes, positions, and relationships. The constraint solver then dynamically adjusts layout parameters to satisfy these user-defined constraints, achieving both speed and flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static templates to dynamic constraint-based layouts. The layout generation process becomes interactive and adaptive, where the system responds to user constraints in real-time. The constraint solver dynamically adjusts the layout based on user input, allowing flexible modification of graphic element sizes and arrangements without manual template editing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If manual albuming methods are used, then user control over layout is maximized, but time and effort required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser control over layoutVSAvoidtime required for album generation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical manual adjustment process with an automated constraint solving mechanism. Instead of manually dragging and dropping images to achieve desired layouts, users define constraints and the system automatically solves for optimal layouts. This substitution of manual mechanical operations with automated computational processes significantly reduces time while maintaining user control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The constraint solver performs self-service by automatically adjusting layout parameters to satisfy user-defined constraints. The system independently handles the complex calculations and adjustments needed to create valid layouts, freeing users from manual manipulation while preserving their control through constraint specification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated image albuming systems are used, then time consumption is reduced, but interactive control and unpredictability of layout response decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealbum generation efficiencyVSAvoidinteractive control quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by allowing users to define constraints and receiving immediate feedback in the form of generated layouts that satisfy those constraints. Users can adjust constraints and see how the layout responds, creating an interactive feedback loop that maintains control quality while automated efficiency is achieved through the constraint solving process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7644356B2Constraint-based albuming of graphic elements
Publication Date: 2010.01.05 HEWLETT PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LP
  • US7644356B2 patent drawing
  • US7644356B2 patent drawing
  • US7644356B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, machines, systems and machine-readable instructions for albuming graphic elements are described. In one aspect, candidate relative layouts of graphic elements on a page are identified. Each of the candidate relative layouts describes a respective set of layout relationships among the graphic elements. A respective set of constraints describing the corresponding set of layout relationships among the graphic elements is generated for each of the candidate relative layouts. A respective determinate layout of the graphic elements on the page is determined from each set of constraints. One of the determinate layouts is selected as a final layout of the graphic elements on the page.