Constraint-Based Encryption Protocol Selection and Timeslot Scheduling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current encryption management systems focus solely on security-focused metrics, neglecting computational efficiency and cost considerations, which can lead to suboptimal resource utilization and increased operational expenses.

Innovation Solution

Implement a hierarchical approach that considers both cryptographic standards and user policies as hard constraints, along with discretionary factors like energy pricing and compute resources to select and apply encryption schemes, optimizing the encryption process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current encryption management systems focus solely on security-focused metrics, then security requirements are met, but computational efficiency and cost-effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidcomputational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically selects encryption protocols and schedules encryption tasks based on real-time conditions including energy pricing signals and compute resource availability. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt encryption operations to favorable conditions, improving computational efficiency while maintaining security requirements through constraint-based selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by considering multiple factors beyond traditional security metrics, including energy costs and resource availability. By evaluating discretionary factors such as energy pricing signals and adjusting encryption task scheduling based on these parameters, the system achieves cost-effective encryption without compromising security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If encryption tasks are performed without considering energy pricing and resource availability, then security is maintained, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms by monitoring energy pricing signals and compute resource availability to determine optimal encryption task scheduling. This feedback loop enables the system to adjust encryption operations based on current energy costs and resource conditions, reducing operational expenses while maintaining security through constraint-based protocol selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary evaluation of energy pricing signals and resource availability before scheduling encryption tasks. By assessing these conditions in advance and selecting favorable time windows for encryption operations, the system proactively reduces energy costs and operational expenses while ensuring security requirements are met.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If a comprehensive hierarchical approach considering multiple factors is implemented, then computational efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the encryption management process into distinct hierarchical layers: hard constraints (cryptographic standards and user policies) and discretionary factors (energy pricing and resource availability). This segmentation allows the system to systematically evaluate multiple factors without becoming unmanageably complex, as each layer can be processed independently according to its specific requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary encryption management layer that mediates between security requirements and operational optimization goals. This intermediary layer evaluates both hard constraints and discretionary factors, then selects appropriate encryption protocols and schedules tasks accordingly, simplifying the overall system architecture by centralizing the decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250240159A1Optimal selection of protocols and timeslots for applying data encryption
Publication Date: 2025.07.24 DELL PROD LP
  • US20250240159A1 patent drawing
  • US20250240159A1 patent drawing
  • US20250240159A1 patent drawing

AI summary

One example method includes receiving a request for performance of a cryptographic task, such as the encryption of data, associating a cryptographic standard and a user policy with the cryptographic task, associating a discretionary factor with the cryptographic task, and selecting, based on the cryptographic standard, the user policy, and the discretionary factor, a cryptographic mechanism to perform the cryptographic task. The discretionary factor may specify a time, or window of time, when the cryptographic task should be performed.