Construction Element Ribbon Thickness for Masonry Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing construction elements with extra thicknesses for masonry require precise adjustment and complex manufacturing, leading to increased costs and aesthetic issues due to visible interruptions in mortar joints, which affect the stability and appearance of masonry.

Innovation Solution

A construction element with a ribbon-shaped extra thickness on its underside, extending around the perimeter, allows for easier manufacturing and reduced mortar usage, maintaining traditional aesthetics by not interrupting the joint, and improving buoyancy on mortar beds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If extra thicknesses are applied to the upper face of construction elements to enable self-alignment during masonry construction, then the self-alignment capability is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase due to required polishing and height adjustment operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-alignment capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the conventional approach by placing the extra thickness on the lower face instead of the upper face of the construction element. This inversion eliminates the need for polishing and height adjustment operations while maintaining the self-alignment capability during masonry construction, as the extra thickness now directly engages with the mortar bed to provide alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Stability of the object's composition

If extra thicknesses extend to the longitudinal outer faces of construction elements to provide stability, then the stability is improved, but the aesthetic appearance deteriorates due to visible interruptions in mortar joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasonry stabilityVSAvoidaesthetic appearance
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by positioning the extra thickness offset from the longitudinal outer faces of the construction element. This asymmetric placement allows the extra thickness to engage with the mortar for stability while leaving the longitudinal outer faces clear to maintain continuous, uninterrupted mortar joints for aesthetic appearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Stability of the object's composition

If extra thicknesses are applied to construction elements to reduce mortar crushing and increase stability, then the masonry stability is improved, but the construction speed decreases due to interrupted mortar application

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasonry stabilityVSAvoidconstruction speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the extra thickness from the longitudinal outer faces and repositions it on the lower face offset from the edges. This extraction allows mortar to be applied continuously along the longitudinal faces without interruption, maintaining construction speed while the offset positioned extra thickness still provides stability by engaging with the mortar bed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Ease of operation

If multiple extra thicknesses of different heights are applied to the upper face to delimit different regions, then the self-alignment function is improved, but the manufacturing precision requirements increase due to strict dimensional tolerance standards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-alignment functionVSAvoiddimensional tolerance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by concentrating the alignment function in a specific location - the extra thickness on the lower face that directly contacts the mortar bed. This localized approach eliminates the need for multiple extra thicknesses of different heights, thereby reducing manufacturing precision requirements while maintaining effective self-alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4484664A1Building element
Publication Date: 2025.01.01 DI TRAPANI M AGOSTINOI
  • EP4484664A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4484664A1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP4484664A1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

Construction element (1), in particular a concrete block, for the construction of masonry where the construction elements are superimposed and juxtaposed with each other and separated by joints, which construction element has an extra thickness (6) applied to one face of the construction element which extends substantially horizontally when the construction element is part of the masonry, which construction element has at least two cavities (9, 10) which extend essentially vertically when the construction element is part of the masonry, which extra thickness (6) extends substantially around the perimeter of the construction element and is arranged offset from at least the outer longitudinal faces (2) of the construction element.