Construction Hanger Brace With Bonded Guide Member

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing construction hangers for concrete forms are often unrecoverable after concrete hardening, leading to high replacement costs, and they lack efficient load distribution mechanisms, which can result in premature failure of support members.

Innovation Solution

A construction hanger comprising a brace with a guide member bonded to a substantially flat metal plate, featuring an arm that engages beam profiles and a guide with an angled major axis, along with optional bearing plates for load distribution, allowing for secure attachment and load transfer to construction support members like I-beams.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If traditional welded hangers are used, then structural strength is achieved, but manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hanger is divided into two separate components: a brace that engages the beam and a guide member that receives the hanger rod. These components are bonded together using adhesive instead of welding, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining structural integrity. The segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently for its specific function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the welding process (thermal-mechanical system) with a bonding system using adhesive (chemical-mechanical system). This substitution eliminates the complexity of welding operations, equipment requirements, and skill demands while achieving comparable or superior joint strength through proper adhesive selection and application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If hangers are designed for secure load bearing, then reliability improves, but ease of manufacture decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload bearing reliabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the hanger into a brace and guide member, the design allows for simplified manufacturing of each component while maintaining overall reliability. The brace can be manufactured as a simple bent steel bar, and the guide member as a separate casting or formed piece, both of which are easier to produce than integrated welded designs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Replacing welding with bonding simplifies the manufacturing process by eliminating complex welding procedures, reducing skill requirements, and enabling assembly line production. The bonding process can be automated more easily than welding, improving ease of manufacture while maintaining reliable load-bearing capacity through properly engineered adhesive joints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Volume of moving object

If hangers support forms from within form volume, then space utilization improves, but loss of substance increases due to unrecoverability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveform volume utilizationVSAvoidhanger recoverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The hanger design enables dynamic reuse by allowing the guide member to be detached and repositioned for subsequent concrete placements. Unlike traditional fixed welded hangers, this design permits the hanger components to be recovered, inspected, and reused multiple times, reducing material loss and waste while maintaining efficient space utilization within the form volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides a cost-effective, recoverable hanger system that effectively distributes loads, reducing the risk of support member failure and enabling efficient reuse, while ensuring secure attachment of form members to construction support elements.

Implementation Method 1

The guide member is bonded to the brace by means of welding, one or more fasteners, an interference fit, or other technique known to those having skill in the art.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWelding: Welding

Data Source

PatentUS9347231B2Construction hanger brace
Publication Date: 2016.05.24 DAYTON SUPERIOR CORP
  • US9347231B2 patent drawing
  • US9347231B2 patent drawing
  • US9347231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A construction hanger comprising a brace including a first elongated member; an arm extending from one end of the first elongated member at an angle thereto, the arm and the elongated member cooperating to engage the surface of a construction support member; a guide at the end of the elongated member opposite the one end, the guide being capable of receiving a hanger member, the guide being positioned on or formed within the brace and at an angle thereto; the guide tying the hanging member to the construction support member by means of the brace.