Automated Construction Quality Inspection via Image Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The quality of work in construction sites is not managed efficiently due to varying proficiency levels among workers, leading to delays and potential undetected substandard work, as conventional inspection methods are time-consuming and resource-intensive.

Innovation Solution

An information processing method that compares design information with measured information from images of completed work, providing notifications when differences fall within specific acceptable ranges, allowing for focused quality checks and reducing unnecessary processing and power consumption.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional inspection methods are used to check work quality, then all work can be inspected, but it takes a great deal of time and leads to delays in construction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework quality inspection coverageVSAvoidconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical inspection with an automated image processing system that captures images of work objects, extracts features, and compares them against design information to automatically determine quality compliance, thereby eliminating time-consuming manual inspection while maintaining comprehensive quality coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates digital copies of the work through image capture and processing, generating measured information that replicates the physical work characteristics. This digital replica can be analyzed without physically interfering with or delaying the construction process

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If conventional inspection methods are used to check work quality, then all work can be inspected, but significant hardware resources or power consumption are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework quality inspection coverageVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential features from captured images that are relevant to quality assessment, rather than processing entire high-resolution images. This feature extraction approach significantly reduces computational load and power consumption while maintaining inspection effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs partial processing by focusing only on critical features and areas that impact quality compliance. Rather than analyzing every pixel or detail of the work, the system selectively processes only the necessary portions to determine whether work meets quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If inspection is performed on all objects, then quality can be detected, but it may not be possible to detect an object having quality less than a certain quality due to resource constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality detection accuracyVSAvoidinspection throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different levels of inspection scrutiny to different work objects or features based on their importance. Critical features that significantly impact quality are inspected with higher precision, while less critical aspects receive proportionate attention, optimizing the balance between detection accuracy and processing throughput

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240070596A1Information processing method, information processing device, and recording medium
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY CORP OF AMERICA
  • US20240070596A1 patent drawing
  • US20240070596A1 patent drawing
  • US20240070596A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing method includes: obtaining design information regarding work, the design information including a reference value and an acceptable range that includes the reference value; identifying a difference between the design information obtained and measured information regarding the work by comparing the design information with the measured information, the measured information being obtained from an image obtained by capturing an object on which the work has been performed; and providing a notification to a user when the difference identified falls within a given range that is in a neighborhood of an upper limit or a lower limit of the acceptable range.