Construction Site Scan Alignment Using Fiducial Markers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The construction process of complex structures is prone to errors due to the manual and laborious process of aligning scan images of ongoing construction with computer models, leading to significant re-work, schedule delays, and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using fiducial markers in scan images of a 3D physical structure to automate the alignment with a computer model, allowing for the detection of deviations and refinement of alignment through transformation functions and 3D physical elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If manual alignment of scan images with computer models is used, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but time consumption and labor intensity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment timeVSAvoidalignment automation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

Fiducial markers are pre-placed on the construction site at known locations before scanning begins. These markers serve as predetermined reference points that enable automatic identification and alignment, eliminating the need for manual feature matching during the alignment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Fiducial markers act as intermediary objects between the physical construction site and the digital computer model. The markers appear in both the scanned images and the computer model, serving as common reference points that facilitate automatic alignment through coordinate transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual alignment processes are used, then complex structures can be accommodated, but error detection is delayed and re-work increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconstruction accuracyVSAvoiderror detection timeliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides immediate feedback by automatically comparing the scanned construction images with the computer model using fiducial marker alignment. Deviations are detected and reported in real-time, enabling prompt correction before errors propagate to subsequent construction stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical alignment process is replaced with an automated computational system that uses fiducial markers for precise coordinate transformation. This substitution enables faster, more accurate alignment and deviation detection without human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If automated alignment using fiducial markers is implemented, then alignment speed and accuracy improve, but system complexity and implementation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter space by introducing fiducial markers with known geometric parameters and coordinates. This transformation enables automatic feature recognition and simplifies the alignment problem to a coordinate transformation task based on marker detection, improving speed despite added system elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250182426A1Tracking an ongoing construction by using fiducial markers
Publication Date: 2025.06.05 DOXEL INC
  • US20250182426A1 patent drawing
  • US20250182426A1 patent drawing
  • US20250182426A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for tracking progression of a construction site at different points in time relative to an expected progression of the construction site as represented by a computer model. The method includes generating an image of the construction site by scanning the construction site with an imaging device and detecting a fiducial marker appearing in the image at a location on the construction site. The fiducial marker is unique among fiducial markers positioned on the construction site. The method further includes identifying the detected fiducial marker in association with a unique identifier among the fiducial markers and aligning a coordinate system of the identified fiducial marker with a coordinate system of the computer model, which represents the construction site at points in time.