Consumer-Centric Risk Analysis System for Insurance Gap Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insurance purchasing systems fail to adequately assess consumers' risk profiles, leading to inadequate coverage and unawareness of coverage gaps, as they focus on product-based recommendations rather than consumer-centric needs and do not maintain accurate records of changing insurance requirements over time.

Innovation Solution

A system that conducts a consumer-centric risk analysis by soliciting detailed information about lifestyle, possessions, and contractual obligations, creating a risk profile, and recommending tailored insurance coverage, with the ability to update and track changes, providing gap analysis and comparison reports across multiple insurance policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a product-focused insurance purchasing system is used, then the insurance company can efficiently process underwriting information, but the consumer cannot receive personalized coverage recommendations that address their specific risk profile

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidpersonalization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional product-focused approach by implementing a consumer-centric system that begins with comprehensive risk analysis of the consumer's lifestyle, possessions, and obligations. The system asks questions about the consumer's life situation rather than presenting policy products first, thereby generating personalized coverage recommendations that adapt to each consumer's unique risk profile while maintaining efficient processing through automated analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts coverage recommendations based on multiple consumer parameters including lifestyle factors, possession values, contractual obligations, and dependent information. By continuously evaluating these parameters and their interrelationships, the system generates customized insurance solutions that precisely match each consumer's risk exposure rather than offering standardized products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If traditional underwriting software is used, then premium estimation can be completed quickly, but coverage gaps and inadequacies cannot be identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurchasing timeVSAvoidcoverage gap identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary comprehensive risk analysis and coverage gap identification during the initial consumer interview phase, before policy selection. By proactively analyzing the consumer's complete risk profile including lifestyle, possessions, and obligations, and comparing against available policies, the system identifies coverage gaps early in the process, allowing consumers to make informed decisions without extending the purchasing timeline.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to consumers about their risk profile, identified coverage gaps, and how different policy options address their specific needs. This feedback mechanism includes explaining the implications of coverage selections and alerting consumers to inadequacies, enabling informed decision-making while maintaining efficient processing through automated analysis and comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If consumers self-assess their insurance needs, then the purchasing process can be simplified, but accurate risk profiling cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurchasing simplicityVSAvoidrisk profile accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables consumers to self-complete a comprehensive risk assessment interview at home, eliminating the need for in-person agent meetings. The automated system guides consumers through questions about their lifestyle, possessions, and obligations, then processes their responses to generate an accurate risk profile and personalized coverage recommendations, maintaining both simplicity and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical process of consumer self-assessment with an automated computer-based system that uses algorithms to analyze consumer responses, evaluate risk factors, and generate accurate risk profiles. This substitution maintains ease of operation through user-friendly interfaces while achieving measurement precision through systematic computational analysis of multiple risk parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10803528B2Consumer-centered risk analysis and insurance purchasing systems and methods
Publication Date: 2020.10.13 MDEWAY NADER
  • US10803528B2 patent drawing
  • US10803528B2 patent drawing
  • US10803528B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for insurance risk analysis, insurance policy comparisons, benchmarking, and purchasing. A consumer-focused interview may be used. Conversation-style user interviews may be used, and interviews may be augmented with cognitive techniques. Interview topics may include consumer lifestyle, activities, possessions, and objectives, and other information pertinent to insurable risks. A data import-export engine may be provided to import data from various insurance companies, departments of insurance or data warehouses. Entered, imported, and/or previously stored data may be used to produce one or more of a risk profile report, a risk analysis, a recommended coverage report, a policy download, a gap analysis report, a comparison report of multiple proposals from multiple insurance companies, a policy forms analysis, a policy forms analysis comparison, and/or a benchmark report. Apparatuses and method may include modules for accounting, marketing, communication, consumer and prospect tracking and documentation, and/or insurance and risk management education.