Contact Center Case Merging for Response Consistency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Contact centers face challenges in efficiently handling multiple requests for the same issue across different digital channels, leading to increased response times, duplication of efforts, and inconsistent responses from agents.

Innovation Solution

A computerized system and method that detects similar issues using a Similarity Detection Module (SDM) and a Category Qualifier Module (COM), merging temporary cases with existing cases in the queue when the similarity score exceeds a threshold, and providing an identical response to customers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If agents manually handle each customer request individually, then each customer receives personalized attention, but response time increases significantly and agent productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidagent productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively detecting similar cases and merging them before agents need to handle each request individually. The automated case management system identifies, merges, and routes similar cases in advance, so agents receive pre-consolidated work queues rather than individual scattered requests, significantly reducing response time and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual copy of the case management process through automated detection and merging mechanisms. Instead of agents manually checking for similar cases, the system replicates the case consolidation function automatically, allowing agents to focus on resolution rather than case management overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If multiple agents handle similar issues independently, then each agent can work at their own pace, but responses to the same issue become inconsistent and customer experience degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse consistencyVSAvoidcase management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges similar cases into unified case records, consolidating multiple customer inquiries about the same issue into a single case that can be handled consistently. This ensures all customers receiving similar issues get the same standardized response, improving reliability and response consistency across the contact center.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the state of case management from individual independent cases to merged consolidated cases. By transforming the case structure and adding similarity detection parameters, the system automatically groups related cases together, ensuring consistent handling while managing complexity through automated rules-based merging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If agents work through high volumes of similar cases, then more customers can be served, but duplication of effort increases and agent workload becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoverall service capacityVSAvoidagent effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The case management system performs self-service by automatically detecting similar cases, merging them together, and routing consolidated cases to appropriate agents. This eliminates the need for agents to manually search for and consolidate similar cases, reducing duplicated effort and energy waste while maintaining high service capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where case outcomes and resolutions are captured and used to improve future case merging decisions. By learning from past resolutions, the system becomes more accurate at identifying similar cases, reducing agent effort through better automated consolidation while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250141996A1System and method for providing an identical response to a similar issue that is received from different customers, via inbound-interaction in a digital multi-channel contact center
Publication Date: 2025.05.01 NICE LTD
  • US20250141996A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141996A1 patent drawing
  • US20250141996A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for providing an identical response to a similar issue that is received from different customers. The computer-implemented method includes when a contact-center occupancy-rate is above a first-preconfigured-threshold, for each inbound-interaction from a customer that is entering an interactions-queue: (i) creating a temporary-case for an issue raised in the inbound-interaction; (ii) operating a Similarity Detection Module on the created temporary-case and cases in a cases-queue to receive a similarity-score for the created temporary-case; (iii) when the received similarity-score is above a second-preconfigured-threshold, operating a category Qualifier Module on the temporary-case to provide an indication as to qualification of a category of the issue raised; (iv) when the provided indication as to qualification of the category of the issued raised is qualified, merging the temporary-case with cases in the cases-queue and retrieving a response of the cases in the cases-queue; and (v) sending the retrieved response to the customer.