Contact-Free Operator Interface for Handheld Power Tools

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing handheld power tool operator interfaces require physical contact for input detection, which can be inconvenient and unsafe, and struggle to differentiate between voice commands and ambient noise.

Innovation Solution

A contact-free operator interface with voice and acoustic sensors for detecting voice commands, a filter unit to separate voice commands from ambient noise, and a projector unit for projecting virtual control elements, along with an optical sensor for detecting virtual input, enabling convenient and safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If physical contact control elements are used, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation and safety deteriorate due to inconvenience and safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical contact-based control elements with contactless sensing technology. The operator interface detects operator inputs without physical contact, substituting mechanical interaction with optical or other non-contact sensing mechanisms, thereby improving ease of operation while maintaining acceptable device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection mechanism between the operator and the control system. Instead of direct mechanical contact, an intermediate field (optical, electromagnetic, or other sensing field) mediates the interaction, allowing contactless detection of operator inputs while managing system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If voice sensors are added for contact-free detection, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The operator interface is designed to perform multiple functions: detecting voice commands, detecting gestures, and potentially other contactless input methods. This multi-functionality consolidates various control capabilities into a single unified interface, improving ease of operation while managing device complexity through functional integration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If voice sensors are used to detect voice commands, then ease of operation improves, but measurement precision deteriorates due to difficulty in differentiating voice commands from ambient noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms to continuously monitor and analyze acoustic signals. By comparing detected signals against expected voice command patterns and adjusting detection parameters in real-time, the system improves its ability to distinguish voice commands from ambient noise, thereby maintaining measurement precision while preserving ease of operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system dynamically adjusts parameters such as sensitivity thresholds, frequency ranges, and pattern recognition criteria based on ambient conditions. This adaptive parameter adjustment enables the system to maintain high measurement precision for voice command detection across varying environmental noise levels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If multiple sensors are added for contact-free detection, then ease of operation improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple sensing functions (voice detection, gesture detection, and potentially other contactless sensing) into a single integrated operator interface. This merging of functions into one unified system improves ease of operation by providing diverse contactless control options while managing device complexity through integration rather than separate independent systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables improved handling and reliable acquisition of voice commands, minimizing interference from ambient noise and allowing for flexible and safe operation of handheld power tools.

Implementation Method 1

the operator interface has at least one voice sensor, which is provided to record at least one voice command from the operator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound wave conversion:

Implementation Method 2

it is proposed that the operating device has at least one acoustic sensor, which is intended to record at least one ambient noise

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound wave conversion:

Implementation Method 3

an optical sensor for detecting virtual input

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection:

Data Source

PatentEP3112089B1Control device for a handheld machine tool
Publication Date: 2020.01.01 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP3112089B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3112089B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3112089B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

The invention relates to an operating device for a hand-held power tool (12a; 12b; 12c), comprising an operator interface (14a; 14b; 14c) designed to capture at least one user input for controlling the hand-held power tool (12a; 12b; 12c). It is proposed that the operator interface (14a; 14b; 14c) be designed to capture the at least one user input without physical contact.