Contact Sensor Tampering Detection via Dual Hall Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing contact sensors are unreliable, costly, and take up more space due to their inability to effectively detect tampering attempts, such as the introduction of a second permanent magnet to alter the magnetic field.

Innovation Solution

A contact sensor utilizing two magnetic field sensors, such as Hall effect sensors, placed adjacent to a permanent magnet to detect 'Open/Close' events and determine if the sensor has been tampered with by adding a masking magnetic field.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If additional reed switches are added to detect tampering attempts, then tampering detection capability is improved, but device complexity, cost, and space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering detection capabilityVSAvoidnumber of reed switches
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnetic field sensing function by using two separate magnetic field sensors positioned at different locations relative to the permanent magnet. Each sensor detects magnetic field changes independently, allowing the system to distinguish between legitimate door/window movement and tampering attempts based on the pattern of field changes at different positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces magnetic field sensors as intermediary detection elements that indirectly detect tampering attempts by measuring changes in the magnetic field caused by intruder magnets. This intermediary approach allows detection without direct contact or additional mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple reed switches are used to detect masking magnets, then tampering detection is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemasking detection accuracyVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical reed switch system with magnetic field sensors that use magnetic field detection principles. This substitution eliminates the need for multiple reed switches while achieving the same tampering detection function, thereby reducing manufacturing costs and simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The magnetic field sensors serve multiple functions: they detect both legitimate door/window movement and tampering attempts by analyzing magnetic field changes. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate detection mechanisms, reducing component count and manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If additional reed switches are added for tampering detection, then security is improved, but space requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against tamperingVSAvoidsensor assembly area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the two magnetic field sensors at different spatial locations relative to the permanent magnet, creating a three-dimensional sensing arrangement. This dimensional approach allows the system to detect tampering attempts through the pattern of magnetic field changes across different positions, eliminating the need for additional sensors in the same plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution provides a reliable and cost-effective contact sensor that can accurately detect 'Open/Close' statuses and tampering attempts, enhancing security and reducing space requirements.

Implementation Method 1

two magnetic field sensors, such as Hall effect sensors, that are placed adjacent to a permanent magnet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHall effect: Hall Effect

Data Source

PatentEP3881300B1Contact sensor with masking detection feature
Publication Date: 2025.03.05 TYCO FIRE & SECURITY GMBH
  • EP3881300B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3881300B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3881300B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A contact sensor includes a permanent magnet, first and second magnetic field sensors, and a computing device in communication with the first and second magnetic field sensors and configured to execute an "Open/Close" function to generate an "Open/Close" decision, and a "Masking" function to generate a "Masking" decision, based on at least one of a first measurement from the first magnetic field sensor or a second measurement from and the second magnetic field sensor.