Contact Element Wear Determination Using Arc Phase Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining wear on contact elements of electrical switches, particularly in high or medium voltage applications, are not reliable enough for accurate prediction and are often costly and risky, as they require frequent maintenance and may miss early signs of wear, leading to potential malfunctions or performance loss.

Innovation Solution

A method that records electrical values relevant to the arc during switching operations and calculates wear values using multiple wear contribution calculation rules, each applicable to specific subsets of recorded current values, allowing for a more accurate assessment of wear across different arc phases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If periodic maintenance is performed frequently, then reliability is improved by identifying wear early, but maintenance costs and operational disruption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous monitoring of electrical values (current, voltage, power) during switching operations and provides feedback about contact wear status. This allows the system to automatically detect wear progression and trigger maintenance only when necessary, replacing periodic maintenance with condition-based maintenance that responds to actual wear states rather than predetermined schedules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system enables the switch to self-diagnose its own wear condition by continuously analyzing electrical parameters during operation. The system calculates wear contributions from individual switching operations and accumulates them to determine overall wear status, allowing the equipment to monitor itself without requiring external inspection or disassembly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If contact wear is monitored continuously, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear measurement accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses electrical parameters (current, voltage, power) as intermediary measurements that can be obtained non-invasively during normal operation. Instead of directly measuring physical contact wear which would require disassembly, the system measures electrical values that correlate with wear and uses these as proxies to infer wear status, enabling indirect but accurate measurement without mechanical intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical wear measurement methods (which would require physical access, disassembly, and direct measurement of contact surfaces) with electrical measurement methods. By substituting mechanical inspection with electrical parameter analysis, the system achieves continuous monitoring capability without the complexity of mechanical measurement devices or system shutdown requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If wear determination uses multiple calculation rules for different arc phases, then manufacturing precision is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewear calculation accuracyVSAvoidcalculation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the arc process into distinct phases (ignition phase, steady-state phase, extinction phase) and applies different wear contribution calculation rules to each phase. This segmentation allows the system to account for the varying wear mechanisms that occur at different stages of the arc, improving accuracy by matching the calculation method to the specific physical conditions of each phase rather than using a single generalized formula

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a more reliable and automated means of determining wear on contact elements, reducing maintenance costs and enabling early identification of wear issues before they become critical, thus improving the reliability and longevity of electrical switches.

Implementation Method 1

the arc that occurs during a switching operation (e.g., a protective shutdown) leads to material wear on the contact pieces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS9406451B2Method and apparatus for determining the wear on a contact element
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 ABB (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • US9406451B2 patent drawing
  • US9406451B2 patent drawing
  • US9406451B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining the wear on a contact element of an electrical switch, for example, of a switching installation for high or medium voltage, includes recording electrical values which represent an electrical variable, which is relevant to an arc occurring at the switch during a switching operation, as a function of time, and calculating a wear value, which represents the wear on the contact element, from a plurality of wear contribution values. The wear contribution values are calculated from a plurality of subsets of the recorded electrical values using a plurality of wear contribution calculation rules, with the result that each of the wear contribution values is calculated from a respective one of the subsets of values according to a respective one of the wear contribution calculation rules. At least two of the wear contribution calculation rules differ from one another.