Contactor Coil Control Using Inrush-Hold Current Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional contactors face issues with high energy consumption, coil heating, and contact damage due to uncontrolled current flow and frequent switching, while complex and costly flyback circuits are used for coil control.

Innovation Solution

A control device for contactors using two magnetic units with a single high side control unit, employing an inrush and hold phase with freewheeling units to manage current flow efficiently, reducing power consumption and simplifying control logic.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a larger current is ensured to flow through the coil for reliable pull-in, then the contactor pull-in reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases and coil heating occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontactor pull-in reliabilityVSAvoidcoil energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The coil control is segmented into two distinct phases: inrush phase and hold phase. During the inrush phase, a larger current flows through the coil to ensure reliable pull-in of the movable contact. Once the contact is engaged, the system transitions to the hold phase where a smaller current is sufficient to maintain the engaged state. This segmentation allows the system to use high current only when necessary for reliability, rather than continuously, thereby reducing overall energy consumption and preventing coil heating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If one switch is used to control one coil with uncontrolled current, then the control device complexity is reduced, but the contactor state switches frequently causing contact damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol device complexityVSAvoidcontact life
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts the coil current based on the operational phase. During the inrush phase, the full switching capacity is utilized to quickly engage the contactor. Once engaged, the system transitions to the hold phase where the current is reduced and maintained at a lower level. This dynamic control prevents frequent and unnecessary state switching, reducing mechanical stress and wear on the contacts, thereby extending contact life while maintaining relatively simple control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Use of energy by moving object

If a flyback circuit based coil control scheme is used, then coil current control is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil current control efficiencyVSAvoidcontrol circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the complex flyback circuit from the coil control system. Instead of using a flyback topology with its associated complexity, the invention employs a simplified control approach using multiple switches (high side and low side controls) that can directly regulate coil current. This extraction of the flyback circuit maintains effective current control during both inrush and hold phases while significantly reducing device complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Use of energy by moving object

If a buck circuit is designed to hold the coil, then energy consumption is reduced, but the design difficulty and validation period increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoil holding energy consumptionVSAvoidcircuit design ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control circuit is designed with multi-functionality to perform both inrush current delivery and holding current regulation using the same switch network. The high side and low side controls work together to first deliver high current for pull-in, then seamlessly transition to providing lower holding current without requiring a separate buck circuit. This universal approach achieves energy-efficient holding while avoiding the design complexity and extended validation associated with dedicated buck circuits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves lower power consumption, extends contactor life by reducing contact collisions, and simplifies control logic, while maintaining reliable operation.

Implementation Method 1

When the contactor coil is energized, the coil current may generate a magnetic field. The generated magnetic field causes the static magnetic core to generate electromagnetic suction to attract the movable magnetic core.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

a freewheeling unit connected across a branch comprising the first magnetic unit and the first low side control unit, and connected across a branch comprising the second magnetic unit and the second low side control unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic field maintenance: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP4080536B1Contactor, and device and method for controlling same
Publication Date: 2025.11.12 SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC IND SAS
  • EP4080536B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4080536B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4080536B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to contactor, and device and methodfor controlling same. A control device for a contactor comprises a high side control unit, a first low side control unit, a second low side control unit, a freewheeling unit, and a controller. The high side control unit is configured to switch on or switch off the connection of the first magnetic unit and the second magnetic unit of the contactor with a power supply. The first low side control unit is configured to switch on or switch off the connection of the first magnetic unit with the reference voltage node. The second low side control unit is configured to switch on or switch off the connection of the second magnetic unit with the reference voltage node. The freewheeling unit is connected across a branch comprising a first magnetic unit and a first low side control unit and connected across a branch comprising a second magnetic unit and a second low side control unit. The controller is configured to control the operation of the high side control unit, the first low side control unit, and the second low side control unit. Embodiments of the present disclosure may enable intelligent control of contactors with simple control logic.